melmi

joined 2 years ago
[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

I can't help but wonder if Itch is intentionally going for a malicious compliance route. As you say, it's tougher to defend rape and incest content, so if they'd opened with that they likely wouldn't have gotten nearly as much media attention. But by doing it this way, half the internet is talking about payment processors forcing itch to delist NSFW games, even giving juicy headlines like LGBTQ games being disproportionately affected. Then Collective Shout of all groups was forced onto the back foot and forced to say "wait no we just wanted the rape and incest games gone" but now that the story is out there it has a life of its own.

Even if they didn't do it on purpose, it seems like it's created a much more effective movement than if they had done it "properly", regardless of the reason for why it worked out this way.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

To the contrary, on a party level the democrats seem to be failing to capture any radical energy at all. They're broadly playing to the center, and alienating progressives in the process, whereas the right is very effectively turning the radicalization pipeline straight into support for the Republicans. Unless you mean to imply the Democrats' goal is to radicalize people away from their own platform.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think you're mixing multiple endings. Far Cry 4-6 all have quick endings like that but none of them I know of fit your description?

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a myth; the term "bug" for mistake predates the famous moth incident.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't mind if Valve did. It's the unaccountable payment processors deciding morality that's spooky, because there's no meaningful alternative.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Wanting to own billions isn't necessarily evil. I'd say it's actually pretty common to want to be a billionaire in our society; the desire to gain wealth is core to capitalism. They may not understand the consequences of it or be able to conceptualize of the people they'd hurt.

Hypothetically, if we treated it as an illness (or rather a symptom) we could shift societal norms and rehabilitate people who express signs of trying to hoard wealth.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would you not want to mute fast? I feel like muting fast is even better than blocking fast.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

The TNG Technical Manual explains the change, it went from a cubic function to a logarithmic function along with some technobabble justification for why. There's also some interesting background info and formulas on Memory Alpha, apparently the scale change happened in 2312 according to some magazine.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nah AGT and Picard don't happen in the same timeline. AGT was some sort of alternate timeline. But the events of the Prime timeline diverge enough from the AGT timeline that it makes more sense that the new warp scale was unique to the AGT timeline and didn't happen in the Prime.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

The scale changed from TOS to TNG. Then in All Good Things which is the only other time we've seen it presumably they changed the scale again.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've grown to resent the term "slop"

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Tbf it's a comedy show, it being informative is mostly an accident. This one is rare for being factual and not about why we should nuke the moon or which cartoon characters are invited to the cookout or something like that.

 

It seems that the issue was resolved behind closed doors, so it could have been resolved behind closed doors to begin with, and then if the defederation was to go ahead simply announce the defederation.

Making an announcement "it will be defederated in 48 hours" made for this weird countdown drama thread (we even had programming.dev people show up and be sad about defederation!) that didn't really go anywhere, and then y'all just locked it when we refederated and made it clear that you were never interested in input and you'll be running the instance as you please (which is well within your rights of course). So what was the point of the thread?

I can see how it is nice to have warning if a community you're involved in is going to be defederated, but it also drags drama to our nice little corner of the fediverse, and pins it at the top of our feeds for all to see. In fact it shows up as the top of every feed for me, Local, All, and Subscribed. I can't get away from it.

Every time these threads show up they end up blowing up. Honestly, if you didn't make these threads, I wouldn't care who you defederate. But because the thread exists, I have to come in and I have to have an opinion. That's a personal issue and I recognize that, but I would hazard a guess that I'm not the only one. People who have never interacted with Blahaj nor the instance getting defederated show up in these threads sometimes. These threads invite drama, and for me personally, whenever they come up they make this space feel significantly less safe and make me want to leave Lemmy as a whole because it feels like it's just nonstop defederation drama for days at a time, but it's pinned at the top of my feed.

Maybe these threads actually provide utility, and I should just take these threads as a sign I should take a break from the Internet for a bit. But to me, they just seem like they're all downsides.

 

I know you're supposed to pronounce it along the lines of "blo-hi", but the Anglicized "blahaj" is so hard to resist!

view more: next ›