mateomaui

Maybe to Trump. He isn’t too swift.

It’s a good movie, totally worth watching.

Now Maui is a brown, unattractive desert with uncontrolled wildfires instead of controlled fires with irrigation sprinklers.

Maui is going to die.

If you ended that reply by commenting on the central valley alone, you might have a valid point, but you imply all of Maui is brown and going to die. That is incorrect. I am also on this island and can see it myself.

edit: it also leaves out how most residents also wanted the cane burning and plowing to stop because it was a health problem, and how companies are slowly replanting that land with various crops that don’t cause the same type of issues, but are still in early stages.

It also implies that there’s only one place affected by the ashfall and dust by being downwind, which is incorrect when people in Kihei, Wailuku and Paia can be affected (as experienced personally by myself in all three places), which are all in entirely different directions. The wind doesn’t always blow one way here.

edit2: it’s also weird that this reply was to an article about roosters, but instead of commenting on that problem here, you went with something completely unrelated.

Well since you seem to have run the full course of denial and ignorance, I’ll leave you to your ongoing delusion. Now the main question is whether or not you’re capable of not responding.

You simply have nothing, and everything I’ve said is reflected in the replies. You said I described myself but cannot point to anything showing that. You have nothing but delusion.

Strangely enough, that’s essentially the problem you had to begin with.

As said before, the reply “no fucking shit” was inherently an acknowledgment that there was a technical difference between liable and guilty, such as “no duh” or similar, but you continued arguing even though the point was acknowledged. You were arguing about something I wasn’t contesting. That is still the case, regardless how you’d prefer to remember it.

And you’re the one who kept coming back, and all these ad hominem attacks and denial are all you have left.

several days ranting

Again, I left for three days, didn’t think about this at all. Replying to you back then and replying today doesn’t qualify as days of ranting, but I realize you have trouble with reading things. I’d wager you’re the one getting upset, because it is evident in your replies.

Oddly enough, apparently if I keep responding, you’re also incapable of stopping yourself.

Which isn’t surprising, considering you demonstrated this lack of control to begin with.

Your impression that this is “rage” is also amusing.

I was gone on a three day weekend and didn’t think about this at all. Wasn’t on lemmy at all. That’s how much it bothered me. Not at all. If you didn’t want a reply when I got back, you should have taken your own advice and grown up. This isn’t a tantrum, my pulse hasn’t raised a bit. This had been explanations for you, not that you’re able to understand that.

As said by the guy who repeatedly left and came back. Again, highly amusing.

I’m also enjoying the fact you cannot stop replying, and are apparently incapable of being honest about it.

I mean, you cried and left multiple times, then came back later and said someone else should grow up. That is the definition of projection.