mateomaui

joined 2 years ago
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 46 points 2 years ago

“He does not have the right to say and do exactly what he pleases. Do you agree with that?” she asked Trump attorney John Lauro, who responded: “100%.”

oooooooo someone is getting yelled at today

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago

has become the first online platform to be issued with a $610,500 fine under Australia’s Online Safety Act

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

fired ~~some people~~ practically everyone

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 10 points 2 years ago

hoping that it stays atypical

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

I’m totally down for locking Trump in stocks on the National Mall as part of his punishment. Sounds like a good idea.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

I would argue that “Constitutionalists” (with the quotes) are the people I’m talking about, as opposed to actual Constitutionalists. But yes, we agree. I’m honestly not certain if people read the snark in my original reply or not.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just wondering what kind of cruelty would have to be added to this unusual punishment to qualify as illegal.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

That man just gets more stupid as time goes on, can see why his base identifies with him so much.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

a fine distinction

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hannibal Lecter’s support

That’s the craziest thing I’ve read today. Now I have to go find that for context.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

I’m sorry, fucking what now?

That’s the nation’s constitutionalists’ preferred candidate, everyone, nothing wrong here.

view more: ‹ prev next ›