I have to admit “Republican without a bank account” and “shares lack of porn activity with son” were not on my GOP bingo card.
mateomaui
joined 2 years ago
idk why Republicans are so upset at him, he seems to be their natural leader.
Or maybe more people are thinking for themselves and not buying in to the BS.
oh no, not a warning from conservatives.
That’s enough internet for today.
I have the one from yts. Stats are
- 1920x696
- 24 fps frame rate
- 2248 kbps data rate
- 2632 kbps total bitrate
It looks like they just went with an unusual aspect ratio to artificially make it seem “even more widescreen”, which isn’t unheard of. Lawrence of Arabia was 2.20:1 or 2.35:1 depending on 70mm vs 35mm.
If you look at this cheat sheet, 2.20:1 isn’t even on there, and 2.35:1 is an oddball 1920x817.
So, could be normal, or maybe not.
edit: the wikipedia page for it says
”To give the film the feel of classic Hollywood epics like Ben-Hur, the filmmakers opted to shoot the film in 2.76:1 ultra-wide aspect ratio.”
which also isn’t on that cheat sheet.
You don’t let people eat in their own rooms that they rent?
Maybe have fewer asshole-ish rules that even “normal” people would find confusing.
Just totally bizarre.
That didn’t quite go in the direction I was expecting.
edit: also probably said by astronauts.
I’ve never heard anyone compare pixelation size to their cat’s poop before.
But maybe God told him to do it. Checkmate.