mars296

Yes but if for example management is pressuring employees to make repairs in X amount of time that causes them to have to rush, its the company's fault. Similar to Norfolk Southern giving train engineers 45 seconds per train car to do safety inspections.

I work for a local environmental regulator. Our offices are located in one of the most accessible locations in the city possible for public transportation and walkability. Our higher ups wanted to move to an office that would require everyone to drive (no walking distance housing and very little public transport access). Luckily there would not be enough parking for the employees... They also wanted everyone to return to office full time but received enough pushback so that office staff will only have to go twice.

People in power do not see the big picture because they are distracted by politics or they personally don't want their daily lives inconvenienced.

I can't help with your technical issue but I thought youbmight be interested in the community/magazine(kbin) I made for Hell Let Loose. !HellLetLoose

The ! Thing doesn't seem to have worked properly so https://kbin.social/m/HellLetLoose

There are still Douglas DC-3's in active use.

But you said you would disagree with any comment. Therefore, I knew you would disagree with my previous comment.

You disagree with this comment.

Article says he was 54

I thought Crusafer armor was supposed to protect the wearer from a mace.

I don't think Santos would get money from this? It looks to be a satirical take based on him so I don't think he is attached in any way. But when real life is so ridiculous its hard to imagine a satire.

They didn't actually lie under oath. They say that the ruling is precedent and settled law. They do not say that they would not overturn precedent.

And they will always argue that you do not want a justice that is not willing to overturn pass precedents. If not for overturning past precedents, segregation, etc. would still be legal.

I think its expected for a conservative to make bad-faith arguments. In principle I agree that since justices are not supposed to be partisan politicians should not be asking how the justice would rule on a future case. But it is bullshit that the nominee doesn't have to give real answers to their thoughts on past cases.

The documentary you watched was probably on a different species. From the article:

"With the help of a sniffer dog, the team found traces of tunnels and discovered a golden mole in 2021. But because there are 21 species of golden moles and some look very similar, the team needed more to be certain that it was a De Winton’s."

He needs a new nickname then. Cheetahs are very fast but don't travel long distances. Whats something very fast but also travels long distances? Tuna?