Matrix is the same and no one wants to use it. Why?
marauding_gibberish142
Florida man strikes again!
Who owns LeMonde?
Just lol at Synology trying to do an Nvidia
Synology is like Ubiquity in the self-hosted community: sure it's self-hosted, but it's definitely not yours. End of the day you get to deal with their decisions.
Terramaster lets you run your own OS on their machine. That's basically what a homelabber wants: a good chassis and components. I couldn't see a reason to buy a Synology after Terramaster and Ugreen started ramping out their product lines which let you run whatever OS you wanted. Synology at this point is for people who either don't know what they're doing or want to remain hands-off with storage management (which is valid; you don't want to do more work when you get home for work). Unfortunately, such customers are now out in the lurch, so TrueNAS or trust some other company to hold your data safe.
Thanks
Alpine isn't exactly fortified either. It needs some work too. Ideally you'd use a deblobbed kernel with KSPP and use MAC, harden permissions, install hardened_malloc. I don't recall if there's CIS benchmarks or STIGs for Alpine but those are very important too. These are my basic steps for hardening anything. But Alpine has the advantage of being lean from the start. Ideally you'd compile your packages with hardened flags like on Gentoo but for a regular container and VM host that might be too much (or not - depends on your appetite for this stuff).
I'm looking at buildbot
I don't get it. Where is the idea that "Fedora focuses on security" coming from? Fedora requires an equivalent amount of work like other distros to harden it.
I personally use Alpine because I trust busybox to have less attack surface than normal Linux utils
Asking the important questions
How exactly would they ban them? DNS poisoning?
We need to let them know and ask for an explanation