mac01021

joined 10 months ago
[–] mac01021@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Certainly you're right about the computers and gates and trains. But 9.8 watts per occupant may be enough to light the station when it's in use.

[–] mac01021@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suppose.

  • One story has the IEA saying global fossil fuel consumption will peak this decade.

  • The other says declining fossil fuel prices will inhibit the transition away from fossil fuel use.

You're right, the two things are consistent in that together they forecast a near-term peak followed be a very slow, drawn-out permanent decline.

I still think it would be much better journalism if the two things would both be discussed in the same news article.

[–] mac01021@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 months ago

Here's a non-paywalled version: https://archive.is/GYLJ5 (you can usually find these articles at archive.is)

[–] mac01021@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This report (https://slrpnk.net/post/14308357) came out, on the same day, about the IEA saying basically the opposite of this. It seems like they don't have a coherent story to tell.