Touche
m0darn
The big pocket is for boromir?
Shouldn't that be like contempt of congress or something?
The Council of Nicea didn't establish the books of the bible.
I think it established the Trinity or laid the groundwork for it.
On top of the fact that the gases have lower molecular weights than air, they are also at 37°C or 310K ie ~5% lighter still.
This letter is saying that it's not a sin to get married right? Because Paul didn't think anyone should get married because the world was about to end, like any second.
I don't think it by any means over turned the convention of multiple wives and concubinage.
He also says there's no such thing as male and female in Christ right? So if two Christians want to get married in Christ it doesn't matter what their pre-marriage genders were, because they're one in Christ right?
It is James in Acts 15:13-18 that quotes Amos 9:11-12.
The Septuagint translation says (paraphrased)
I will rebuild the dwelling of David, so that all other peoples may seek the Lord- even all the gentiles over whom my name has been called.
Whereas a better (paraphrased) translation of Amos 9 is:
I will rebuild the dwelling of David, so that they may possess the remnant of Edom and all the nations who are called by my name.
So the referenced scripture is about a restored kingdom of David (re)possessing what's left of Edom, and rebuilding Israel. If you look at the subsequent verses, for example: I will restore the fortunes of my people Israel, and they shall rebuild the ruined cities and inhabit them. It's not about the gentiles seeking the Lord. The mistranslation comes from "Edom" being translated as Adam (no vowels in Hebrew) so a "remnant of Edom" being mistranslated as the descendants of Adam.
I think the idea of James quoting a Greek version of Scripture at the first council of Jerusalem, in a discussion about whether to accept Greeks no less, to be rather suspect. It seems most likely to me that this account is being retrojected from considerable distance.
Some depictions of marriage in the Bible include married men having teenage sex slaves right?
I'm not American and don't know how RICO (?) charges work but are they relevant here?
100%. Maybe the tower thought it was an ultralight because no radio contact/transponder and conveyed that to the pilots.
If you can see that it is a 172 it's like mistaking an F150 for a Model T pickup. Not a mistake that would happen when you can clearly see it.
The book of Acts properly contains a mistranslation in its retelling of the first council of Jerusalem. In it James (I think it was) quotes the Septuagint as justification for converting the gentiles. That passage of the Septuagint is a mistranslation and is quite irrelevant if properly translated.
Yeah you can use a visual one!
Jim's the camera