lvxferre

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

One potential regression that I see is that the current generative models are abandoned, after being ruled as "infringing copyrights" by multiple countries. The tech itself won't disappear but it'll be considerably harder to train newer ones.

The most problematic part is however if one of them survives; likely Google. That would lead to a situation as in your second paragraph.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Ah, got it. My bad. Yeah, not providing anything is even lazier, and unlike "lazy" bash scripts it leaves the user clueless.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I like them, even for software installation. Partially because they're lazy - it takes almost no effort to write a bash script that will solve a problem like this.

That said a flatpak (like you proposed) would look far more polished, indeed.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Frankly in this case even a simple bash script would do the trick. Have it check your distro, version, and architecture; if you got curl and stuff like this; then ask you if you want the stable or beta version of the software. Then based on this info it adds Mullvad to your repositories and automatically install it.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I have this extension; it works great, and it has support for other engines (I use mostly DuckDuckGo), and if you really need the results from one of the blocked sites you just click a link and it shows them again. Give the link a check for the list of supported search engines.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I've done similar experiments with my two cats. Both behaved mostly like dogs - the mirror doesn't smell like a cat nor makes noise like a cat, so why bother with it? I was rather surprised with Siegfrieda ignoring it because she tends to watch whatever I put on the computer screen, be it some "cat game" video or even anime.

That lower emphasis on vision became specially obvious when I showed them videos with kittens meowing. They didn't bother with the screen, but with the speakers.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You're welcome.

I think that people being jerks take for granted how confusing this might be, if you're new; we (people in general) tend to take vocab that we already know for granted, as well as solutions for small problems. ...except that it doesn't work when you're starting out, and we all need to start out somewhere, right.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I looked for it for, like, a hour or so, but couldn't find the scanned copies. The nearest that I've found was the online version of the lexicon, claiming that it contains all six volumes.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

You have two options: install curl (check @TrickDacy@lemmy.world's comment) or do it manually. Installing curl is the easiest.

If you want to do it the hard way (without the terminal), here's how:

  1. Download the file https://repository.mullvad.net/deb/mullvad-keyring.asc from your web browser.
  2. Open your file browser as administrator. There's probably some link for that in the Menu.
  3. Move the file that you just downloaded to the directory /usr/share/keyrings/
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm proposing to check their texts out because it's a good way to get theoretical background to back up your beliefs, if you believe in a peaceful transition. (Here's a link to a good one, by the way.)

It's also useful for Marxists, given that Marxism always interacted with other left-wing trains of thought. So by reading this stuff you get a better historical context on why Marxism defends some policies instead of other policies.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 191 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (31 children)

It's less complicated than it looks like. The text is just a poorly written mess, full of options (Fedora vs. Ubuntu, repo vs. no repo, stable vs. beta), and they're explaining how to do this through the terminal alone because the interface that you have might be different from what they expect. And because copy-pasting commands is faster.

Can’t I just download a file and install it? I’m on Ubuntu.

Yes, you can! In fact, the instructions include this option; it's under "Installing the app without the Mullvad repository". It's a bad idea though; then you don't get automatic updates.

A better way to do this is to tell your system "I want software from this repository", so each time that they make a new version of the program, yours get updated.

but I have no idea what I’m doing here.

I'll copy-paste their commands to do so, and explain what each does.

sudo curl -fsSLo /usr/share/keyrings/mullvad-keyring.asc https://repository.mullvad.net/deb/mullvad-keyring.asc
echo "deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/mullvad-keyring.asc arch=$( dpkg --print-architecture )] https://repository.mullvad.net/deb/stable $(lsb_release -cs) main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mullvad.list
sudo apt update
sudo apt install mullvad-vpn

The first command boils down to "download this keyring from the internet". The keyring is a necessary file to know if you're actually getting your software from Mullvad instead of PoopySoxHaxxor69. If you wanted, you could do it manually, and then move to the /usr/share/keyrings directory, but... it's more work, come on.

The second command tells your system that you want software from repository.mullvad.net. I don't use Ubuntu but there's probably some GUI to do it for you.

The third command boils down to "hey, Ubuntu, update the list of packages for me".

The fourth one installs the software.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 83 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In response to such critiques [concerning the decline of quality], Reddit spokesperson Rathschmidt said he did not “know of an industry benchmark for scoring content quality”.

My sides went into orbit. It's a Reddit spokesperson acting like the worst of the Reddit userbase: being passive aggressive and using appeal to ignorance, at the same time.

 

The title is click-baity (e.g. what's an "ancient language"?), but the content is still interesting regardless.

A few highlights:

Acc. to the author Great Andamanese ("GA") speakers have been culturally isolated from speakers of other languages for millenniums. It has been described as a dialect continuum, but it's being replaced by Hindi and showing clear signs of language death.

What's unusual about its usage of body parts in the grammar is not the usage itself, but its frequency and how it does it. Excerpts from the article:

If the blood emerged from the feet or legs, it was otei; internal bleeding was etei; and a clot on the skin was ertei. Something as basic as a noun changed form depending on location.

My breakthrough was to realize that the prefix e-, which originally derived from an unknown word for an internal body part, had over eons morphed into a grammatical marker signifying any internal attribute, process or activity. So the act of seeing, ole, being an internal activity, had to be eole. The same prefix could be attached to -bungoi, or “beautiful,” to form ebungoi, meaning internally beautiful or kind; to sare, for “sea,” to form esare, or “salty,” an inherent quality; and to the root word -biinye, “thinking,” to yield ebiinye, “to think.”

 

I'm serious. Specially, the community - you folks, no matter the instance, you rock. You're amazing.

In Reddit it's always a struggle to word your posts/comments in a way that it won't trigger

  • unwarranted assumptions popping out of nowhere
  • "I dun unrurrstand" meaning "I disagree but I'm pretending that you aren't following any logic"
  • "You're saying that because..." [insert insane troll logic] everywhere
  • "U think dat 50 is not 100? Than u think 50 is 0! Dats stupid lol" tier oversimplifications all the fucking time.
  • insert random distortion of what you said, either due to malice or stupidity

Here though? People actually disagree with each other on rational = human grounds. They aren't attacking each other, they're agreeing or disagreeing with what is said!

It's specially noteworthy that even Lemmygrad's community specifically tailored for Leftist infighting is more wholesome than non-discussion subreddits. Like, it's a server made for people with strong political opinions, a community made to let them fight, and yet they can reason better than Reddit.

Please keep being awesome.

 

For me it's pic related. Fairly cheap wine from my chunk of the Southern Cone; I pay the equivalent of two and half euros/dollars for it. And yet it's so good - fruity, but not sweet. It rolls so well on the tongue. Perfect with some head cheese or salami.

The grape is locally known as "Bordô" or "Terci" but you'll find better info about it by its posh name "Ives Noir". Annoying grape; not as much as Pinot Noir (aka The Devil's Grape), but it's rather sensitive.

 

This should be a great resource for beginners interested on Historical Linguistics, specially Indo-European studies. Each "lesson" provides a few pieces of information about either one Indo-European language, focusing mostly on historical and cultural information, but they provide a lot of links for people willing to understand one or more languages better.

(And yes, the banner of this community was proudly stolen from that page.)

 

June 15th will drop by, and everyone will notice what most people here already know: that Reddit is hopeless, and it's showing its middle finger to the community.

Based on that, I was thinking about releasing an infographic, telling people what's going on, and asking them to replace their Reddit content with gibberish. And I'm wondering if more people want to join this.

What do you guys think about this? Would anyone here be willing to contribute?

The infographic would list no authorship. It would be, for all intents and purposes, public domain. The only thing that you'd get in return is the warm feeling that you made internet better, by helping to kill Reddit.

The format is up to debate, but I was thinking about:

It's a picture so it's easier to share; split into sections that can be read in any order that you want (or you can ignore a few of them).

In special, I'd like help of people who write stuff well. I'm pedantic, verbose, an L3 speaker prone to "then who was phone?" grammar, and I genuinely think that plenty people could do better than I can in this aspect.

I also believe that a collective effort from a bunch of people will be probably better than just a single person doing it alone.

 

This paper is '98 and it contrasts the then prevailing theories, in contrast with dialectal and historical evidence, arguing that the origin of periphrastic "do" was a habitual aspect marker.

Two of the earlier hypotheses that the author addresses and criticise:

Contact with Celtic languages - the feature would be borrowed from other languages that English interacted with. Specially prominent due to distribution, as do-periphrasis appeared first on the Western dialects. However unlikely, given that Celtic substratum influence in English was relatively minor.

Some invoke more complex pathways, such as a potential early Germanic-Celtic creolisation; the author claims that this is unattested.

Causative 'do' - occasionally attested in Old English, and frequently in Middle English. I'll adapt the 5a example to highlight the construction:

  • I do to-you know[=witan]... that those devil-idols to-you are harm-bearing

Here the usage of "do" would initially mean something like "make", "cause to", "have". For another example [from my own], consider "I did her tell me what was going on" - the "do" has some meaning but it's rather messy, and dependent on the sentence. (Does that "did" mean "encouraged?" "forced?" "asked?")

The author sees the following problems with this hypothesis:

  • Origin - do-periphrasis originated in the Western dialects, but those were the one that used causative do the least.
  • Motivation - it's harder to claim that an optional causative "do", with no independent semantic value, would eventually evolve into the do-support currently used.

Other hypotheses addressed were the usage of 'do' as a perfective aspect marker and verbal ellipsis. And then the author actually addresses the hypothesis he believes to be correct, linking current do-support to the habitual aspect; for example, in the sentence "I do browse Lemmy", that "do" can be understood as both an emphasiser and as conveying "by rule, usually".

 

Hey everyone, new mod here. I'd like to hear you on a few things, in order to make this community grow:

1. Who should be the primary target audience of this community?

We could tailor it primarily for layperson or for people with deeper Linguistics knowledge. Or we could simply let it roll.

2. Which type of moderation do you guys like? Stricter or laxer?

A stricter moderation would include rules like "quote your sources", "no crack theories" (proto- or pseudo-scientific hypotheses lacking methodological rigour), stuff like this; it would also mean that I'd discourage off-topic a bit further.

3. "Almost no crown or cross" rule: yes, no, indifferent?

By "almost no cross or cross" I mean that posters would only be able to talk about politics and religion as much as necessary for the subject of Linguistics. For example you'd be still fine posting something like this, but you wouldn't be able to discuss here the Marxist side of the matter, only the Linguistic one. Just an example, mind you.

4. How much do you know about Linguistics?

Are you a grad, undergrad, informed layperson, or just curious? Are there areas that you feel confident on, like Sociolinguistics or Phonetics or something like this?

5. Which type of content do you want to see here?

Papers? Videos? Discussions? Historical Linguistics? Sociolinguistics? Phonetics and Phonology? Since mods are IMO responsible to nurture a community, I don't mind looking for stuff to post here, but I'd like to know which one.

Thank you!

EDIT: I'm reading all your comments, even the ones that I didn't reply to, OK?

 

I just posted a paper, but I think that this should be more approachable for people here. It shows a rather interesting pattern between Germanic languages (English, German, Icelandic, Gothic...) and most other Indo-European languages, caused by a sound change. A few examples using Latin vs. English:

  • pēs (foot) vs. foot
  • trēs (three) vs. three
  • canis (dog) vs. hound; see German "Hund" dog for reference
  • decem (ten) vs. ten
  • gelū (ice) vs. cold
  • frāter (brother) vs. brother

Note how the consonants look like they went a "merry-go-round" from one language to another:

  • Latin fricative vs. English voiced stop
  • Latin voiced stop vs. English voiceless stop
  • Latin voiceless stop vs. English fricative

That's all caused by the regular sound changes explained in the Wiki link.

 

This paper from Silvia Luraghi explores the origin of PIE grammatical gender system, as well as proposing how it appeared in the language, in a way that accounts for the following discrepancy:

  • Hittite - two genders system: animate and inanimate
  • Late PIE - typically three genders system: masculine, feminine, and neuter

The animate and inanimate genders would've been inherited by late PIE as the masculine and neuter genders respectively, while the feminine would be the result of a derivational suffix *-h₂ being attached to words, and eventually triggering agreement. Note that the typical IE feminine /a/ (you see it in Latin/Romance and Slavic languages, for example) is believed to be from *h₂, as it's the a-colouring laryngeal.

I know that this paper might be a bit too deep for most folks here to parse, so if you feel intimidated, don't be afraid to ask for help.

 

TL;DW - two days of protest is not enough, and he encourages people to migrate to other platforms, without suggesting which one.

 

The sole current moderator of that community is banned, and I wish to see that community thrive. That's it.

 

As per title. I'm back to modded after a few years, but I'm rather clueless on which version is currently popular.

Bonus question: what are the most common industrial mods nowadays? And are people building their own packs, or downloading them whole?

view more: ‹ prev next ›