I don't even recall pronouncing it in loud voice. In English I simply say "what you see is what you get", and in Portuguese or Italian I rephrase it. (Although I remember at least one person calling it ['vizi 'vige] in Portuguese. And I was, like... "what?")
Mine are "lol" and "lmao". I get what they originally meant, and I get why most people use them nowadays. It's just that they often signal "I have nothing to contribute, but still expect people to read my crap".
As a second (third?) place, "WYSIWYG". If you're going to coin such verbose acronym, might as well sub it with an actual word, like, dunno, "transparent".
EDIT - "lol" = "lots of laughs", "lmao" = "laughing my arse off", "WYSIWYG" = "what you see is what you get".
EDIT2: as another poster correctly pointed out, "lol" also originally meant "laughing out loud". Perhaps even more than "lots of laughs".
Persuasion itself goes from neutral to negative, depending on your moral standards. (They're partially individual, partially cultural.) Because at the end of the day it boils down to "I want you to believe in this, because I benefit from your belief."
And you definitively see some backslash against this aspect of advertisement; same deal with personal communication, a person being excessively rhetoric for their own benefit is immediately labelled distrustful.
Then over that propaganda adds further layers of nastiness, like:
- Often, the one doing propaganda is supposed to defend your interests. Not their/its own.
- You'll usually need to omit and lie far more for propaganda than for other things. Because it's usually a complex matter that involves society as a whole, not just your personal decision.
- Since the political landscape changes, the discourse being propagated may flip 180°.
If I were to discipline my cats by picking them up, one of them would be exactly like in this pic. The other would be tearing my arms apart with the claws of her back legs.
Translation:
- when you're walking alone
- don't you ever feel
- like being observed?
- [God saying] you bloody paranoid
Even here in South America, depending on the region, they're invasive.
Let's go simpler: what if your instance was allowed to copy the fed/defed lists from other instances, and use them (alongside simple Boolean logic plus if/then statements) to automatically decide who you're going to federate/defederate with? That would enable caracoles and fedifams for admins who so desire, but also enable other organically grown relations.
For example. Let's say that you just joined the federation. And there are three instances that you somewhat trust:
- Alice - it defederates only really problematic instances.
- Bob and Charlie - both are a bit prone to defederate other instances on a whim, but when both defed the same instance it's usually problematic.
Then you could set up your defederation rules like this:
- if Alice defed it, then defed it too.
- else, if (Bob defed it) and (Charlie defed it), then defed it too.
- else, federate with it.
Of course, that would require distinguishing between manual and automatic fed/defed. You'd be able to use the manual fed/defed from other instances to create your automatic rules, to avoid deadlocks like "Alice is blocking it because Bob is blocking it, and Bob is blocking it because Alice is doing it".
[Speaking as a user] Yeah, it looks inorganic for me too. As another user said the gold trim signals that the post was gilded, gilding nowadays works like a "mega-upvote" and gives it that trim. It's possible that defenders of the Jewish genocide (Holocaust) and of the Palestinian genocide (the ongoing war) are dumping money in those posts, to promote their shitty discourses.
And that works really well in Reddit because the userbase there loves some oversimplification: they have a really hard time decoupling the Jewish people from the State of Israel.
[Speaking as a mod] Given the topic I'll be monitoring this thread carefully. As such, if anyone here is eager to either promote fascism (rule #1) or witch hunt (to point fingers towards other users based on assumptions or faulty reasoning - rule #1, rule #4): don't. Also remember that the topic of this community is Reddit, there's a lot of leeway for non-divisive off-topic but please don't go overboard.
And if anyone here has concerns that some other user is doing either thing, please use the report button, OK?
I'll translate it here for the benefit of other posters, as there's lots of good info there. Left image:
- [top left] fortress
- [top centre] defence tower
- [top right] AN IBERIAN SETTLEMENT
- [immediately below the above] central street: the life of the settlement was organised around it. Most habitations were on its both sides.
- [bottom left] plaza: it was the meeting place of the inhabitants of the settlement
- [bottom] walls: they surrounded the settlement and were made of stone.
Right image:
- [top left] A CELTIC SETTLEMENT
- [top centre-right] public buildings: at the centre of the settlement, usually there were buildings intended for political and religious purposes.
- [top right] hut: round shaped. The walls were made of adobe and stores; the roof was made of branches and straw
- [almost bottom left] lifestock enclosure: some livestocks was stored inside the settlement.
- [bottom] walls: the settlements were surrounded by a circular wall made of stone.
Corrections welcome given that I don't speak Catalan at all.
Aaaaah. I really, really wanted to complain about the excessive amount of keys.
(My comment above is partially a joke - don't take it too seriously. Even if a new key was added it would be a bit more clutter, but not that big of a deal.)
Wiktionary lists both "laughing out loud" and "lots of laughs". Nowadays though it's neither; on a pragmatic level it doesn't convey "I'm laughing" / "I laughed", it conveys amusement and/or lack of seriousness, depending on the context.