lvxferre

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Isn’t lol short for “laughing out loud”?

Wiktionary lists both "laughing out loud" and "lots of laughs". Nowadays though it's neither; on a pragmatic level it doesn't convey "I'm laughing" / "I laughed", it conveys amusement and/or lack of seriousness, depending on the context.

  • [Alice] The Sun is a star.
  • [Bob] yeah sure the sun only appears at night lol (implying: "I'm amused at what Alice said, and I don't take it seriously.")
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I don't even recall pronouncing it in loud voice. In English I simply say "what you see is what you get", and in Portuguese or Italian I rephrase it. (Although I remember at least one person calling it ['vizi 'vige] in Portuguese. And I was, like... "what?")

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

Mine are "lol" and "lmao". I get what they originally meant, and I get why most people use them nowadays. It's just that they often signal "I have nothing to contribute, but still expect people to read my crap".

As a second (third?) place, "WYSIWYG". If you're going to coin such verbose acronym, might as well sub it with an actual word, like, dunno, "transparent".

EDIT - "lol" = "lots of laughs", "lmao" = "laughing my arse off", "WYSIWYG" = "what you see is what you get".

EDIT2: as another poster correctly pointed out, "lol" also originally meant "laughing out loud". Perhaps even more than "lots of laughs".

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Persuasion itself goes from neutral to negative, depending on your moral standards. (They're partially individual, partially cultural.) Because at the end of the day it boils down to "I want you to believe in this, because I benefit from your belief."

And you definitively see some backslash against this aspect of advertisement; same deal with personal communication, a person being excessively rhetoric for their own benefit is immediately labelled distrustful.

Then over that propaganda adds further layers of nastiness, like:

  • Often, the one doing propaganda is supposed to defend your interests. Not their/its own.
  • You'll usually need to omit and lie far more for propaganda than for other things. Because it's usually a complex matter that involves society as a whole, not just your personal decision.
  • Since the political landscape changes, the discourse being propagated may flip 180°.
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

If I were to discipline my cats by picking them up, one of them would be exactly like in this pic. The other would be tearing my arms apart with the claws of her back legs.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago

Translation:

  • when you're walking alone
  • don't you ever feel
  • like being observed?
  • [God saying] you bloody paranoid
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Even here in South America, depending on the region, they're invasive.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Let's go simpler: what if your instance was allowed to copy the fed/defed lists from other instances, and use them (alongside simple Boolean logic plus if/then statements) to automatically decide who you're going to federate/defederate with? That would enable caracoles and fedifams for admins who so desire, but also enable other organically grown relations.

For example. Let's say that you just joined the federation. And there are three instances that you somewhat trust:

  • Alice - it defederates only really problematic instances.
  • Bob and Charlie - both are a bit prone to defederate other instances on a whim, but when both defed the same instance it's usually problematic.

Then you could set up your defederation rules like this:

  • if Alice defed it, then defed it too.
  • else, if (Bob defed it) and (Charlie defed it), then defed it too.
  • else, federate with it.

Of course, that would require distinguishing between manual and automatic fed/defed. You'd be able to use the manual fed/defed from other instances to create your automatic rules, to avoid deadlocks like "Alice is blocking it because Bob is blocking it, and Bob is blocking it because Alice is doing it".

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago

[Speaking as a user] Yeah, it looks inorganic for me too. As another user said the gold trim signals that the post was gilded, gilding nowadays works like a "mega-upvote" and gives it that trim. It's possible that defenders of the Jewish genocide (Holocaust) and of the Palestinian genocide (the ongoing war) are dumping money in those posts, to promote their shitty discourses.

And that works really well in Reddit because the userbase there loves some oversimplification: they have a really hard time decoupling the Jewish people from the State of Israel.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

[Speaking as a mod] Given the topic I'll be monitoring this thread carefully. As such, if anyone here is eager to either promote fascism (rule #1) or witch hunt (to point fingers towards other users based on assumptions or faulty reasoning - rule #1, rule #4): don't. Also remember that the topic of this community is Reddit, there's a lot of leeway for non-divisive off-topic but please don't go overboard.

And if anyone here has concerns that some other user is doing either thing, please use the report button, OK?

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'll translate it here for the benefit of other posters, as there's lots of good info there. Left image:

  • [top left] fortress
  • [top centre] defence tower
  • [top right] AN IBERIAN SETTLEMENT
  • [immediately below the above] central street: the life of the settlement was organised around it. Most habitations were on its both sides.
  • [bottom left] plaza: it was the meeting place of the inhabitants of the settlement
  • [bottom] walls: they surrounded the settlement and were made of stone.

Right image:

  • [top left] A CELTIC SETTLEMENT
  • [top centre-right] public buildings: at the centre of the settlement, usually there were buildings intended for political and religious purposes.
  • [top right] hut: round shaped. The walls were made of adobe and stores; the roof was made of branches and straw
  • [almost bottom left] lifestock enclosure: some livestocks was stored inside the settlement.
  • [bottom] walls: the settlements were surrounded by a circular wall made of stone.

Corrections welcome given that I don't speak Catalan at all.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Aaaaah. I really, really wanted to complain about the excessive amount of keys.

(My comment above is partially a joke - don't take it too seriously. Even if a new key was added it would be a bit more clutter, but not that big of a deal.)

 

This anime series has the same premise as Bakarina*: an otome games fan reincarnates in one of them, some childhood event forces her to remember her life on Earth, and she realises that she has been reincarnated as the villainess. Then she tries to avoid the bad end of the game at all costs.

But beyond the premise, Last Boss Queen and Bakarina are nothing alike. Pride Royal Ivy is actually insightful and smart, unlike Katarina Claes; what motivates Pride is not fear of her own doom, but to avoid the suffering of the people around her; and the general tone of the Last Boss Queen series is heavier, more likely to pull your emotional strings than to make you laugh.

Overall, based on the manga and WN, I'd say that this is worth watching if you want something more serious in the genre.

The first episode was rather good IMO. It's no high-budget production, but it follows the script of the WN rather well, focusing on Pride and Stale. I feel like some context might be missing for non-readers, but it should be still enjoyable for them.

*Bakarina: fan nickname for the My Next Life as a Villainess: All Routes Lead to Doom! series.

 

Imagine the following situation: some lost lemming posts a random beans fact in a comm that you moderate. It sparks a cool discussion, but it's completely off-topic. In this situation, what do you do?

If you remove the post, you're being that annoying mod telling users to stop having fun. But if you keep the post there, you're encouraging people to post even more off-topic in the comm. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Because of that, I think that it would be cool if we had the ability to migrate posts from one comm to another. This could be done in two steps:

  • mods can "kick" a discussion out of their comms. Those discussions end in a specific comm called c/off-topic, c/general, or whatever the admins of that instance (yup) decide.
  • mods can also "adopt" discussions from c/off-topic and bring to their comms.

I feel like this would be the best of both worlds - it's less disruptive to community, but it still allows users to discuss their random junk.

For reference, Ruqqus had a similar feature, with the +general guild being mostly off-topic stuff. It worked fairly well IMO. 4chan also does something similar to the first step, with the /trash/ board.

 

I'm sharing this old article because it's useful to contrast the situation back then (protests against hate speech) and now (protests due to the APIcalypse).

Here are a few highlights:

  • Back then, the admins were already eager to shift their discourse back and forth, depending on the convenience. Reddit was always about free speech, then it never was.
  • Former CEO Yishan Wong's "[shutting down subreddits] won't become a regular occurrence"
  • If you try to follow the link sourcing the quote above, you'll notice that most Reddit blog official communications towards users are gone. Instead you'll find a blog clearly geared towards investors, vulture capital, and corporate.

Any other old piece of news that you guys feel like sharing, that can be contextualised to show Reddit going downhill?

 

Archive link for the mod statement. From the statement itself:

Anyway, here are some things to keep in mind:

  • Gore and pornography are still not allowed in /r/PICS.
  • Remain civil toward one another.
  • Do not violate the site-wide rules.
  • This link directs back to this comment.
  • It is normal to experience special feelings while looking at John Oliver.
 

This paper describes an IMO rather interesting approach towards fake news, through their morphological content: the words from each piece of news (real and fake) were grouped into categories, then the researchers made a statistical analysis of the usage of those categories in real and fake news. And they found out that:

  • fake news tend to use more foreign words, adjectives and nouns
  • real news tend to use more W-words (who, what), determiners, prepositions and verbs

I think that their findings are damn useful. Perhaps not to detect fake news, but to understand how they work on a discursive level. For example, the usage of foreign words in fake news caught my attention - perhaps they're used to mask the underlying meaning of the utterance? While real news are focused on describing events, and thus rely more on verb usage?

 

Please hide WN/LN/manga spoilers.

MAL entry, Anilist. The zeroth episode is a spin-off-ish, focusing on Sylphy after the Calamity meeting with Ariel, becoming "silent Fitz", and struggling with her new situation; as well as the power struggles between Ariel and her brother I-always-forget-his-name for the Asuran throne.

40
Reddit Blackout Tracker (blackout.photon-reddit.com)
 

It seems that activity in Reddit was considerably slower around the 1st of July, by roughly 1.5k comments per minute. (For reference: the platform usually has between 8k and 3k comments per minute.)

I wonder if there's some way to measure their quality too, as I predict that it dropped harder than the amount.

 

This will probably interest people who are just tipping their toes into Phonetics, as well as language leaners.

 

Excerpt from the text:

However, effective immediately, we plan to discontinue the following activities that we performed, as volunteer moderators, that took up a huge amount of our time and effort, both from a communication and coordination standpoint and from an IT/secure operations standpoint:

  1. Active solicitation of celebrities or high profile figures to do AMAs.
  2. Email and modmail coordination with celebrities and high profile figures and their PR teams to facilitate, educate, and operate AMAs. (We will still be available to answer questions about posting, though response time may vary).
  3. Running and maintaining a website for scheduling of AMAs with pre-verification and proof, as well as social media promotion.
  4. Maintaining a current up-to-date sidebar calendar of scheduled AMAs, with schedule reminders for users.
  5. Sister subreddits with categorized cross-posts for easy following.
  6. Moderator confidential verification for AMAs.
  7. Running various bots, including automatic flairing of live posts
 

I guess that this is the start of the game? The villager and the villainess start their school days.

 

A few highlights:

  • As usual, u/ModCodeofConduct messages outright distort the moderators' position, as if it was unwillingness to moderate.
  • r/firefox opened up again. It's now about literal fire foxes aka red pandas. Mods worry that the sub might [ipsis digitis] "fall into the hands of someone who would undo the good work we have done or would even foster an anti-Mozilla community here."
  • "ModCodeofConduct also argued that switching to private in protest is a violation of the Moderator Code of Conduct." - isn't it funny how users are expected to believe that the moderator code of conduct is more than just convenient excuses for Reddit Inc.?
  • roughly 2k/8k of the subreddits joining the protest are still private. Even if Reddit Inc. plants to replace the mods with sycophants, the later will likely beeline towards the larger communities. I expect the smaller ones to go unmoderated, overall reducing the platform's diversity of communities.
 

Sometimes users submit some content (post or comment), and due to a bug or performance issue the content doesn't appear, even if the instance already saved it. So the user resubmits it over and over... like this:

(This is not my own comment, but I had this issue already.)

While this isn't usually done for the sake of spam, it's still a source of noise for the community, and annoying for the user oneself.

So my suggestion is that, when a user tries to submit a piece of content to Lemmy, Lemmy should compare it with the last piece of content already submitted. And if they're identical, prevent it with some error "warning: duplicate" or similar.

view more: ‹ prev next ›