lugal

I think you're conflating creativity and imagination. The task isn't about physically creating a color but about imaging it. About a mental image of a color you never saw before. Not about actualizing that color.

It's not a counting problem.

You made it into a counting problem so I really don't see your point here

"Give me a color that's not a composite of primary colors" is an impossible task

Exactly. It's even impossible to imagine. We can imagine shapes and form and stuff we never saw and will never see but for colors, this isn't true. That's the whole point.

Under your broader definition of color, we've already found the three or seven or I guess nine if you want to count black/white, existing colors

Which is the point of the meme and I agree with it

all we can creatively accomplish is proving we've exhausted the range of available colors.

There is a lot we can do creatively besides creating new colors from stretch. The meme is about how the human mind is creative but this one thing it can't do.

Besides, how is your method creative? You said yourself it's pure mathematics.

I meant spectrum as in it's not a fixed value but, fine, I can call it range instead. Doesn't change my argument.

What do you mean "hasn't been produced before"? That comes with a huge burden of proof. People produce color gradients all the time. Pretty many colors in them.

And if you produce a shade of blue that by happenstance is either more or less saturated than anything else, what have you found there? It isn't a new color by any meaningful definition. It won't blow anyone's mind, it's just a shade of blue similar but not identical to other blue shades. It falls into the blue range. The observable light is devided into colors, each inhabiting a range. The exact way is different depending on language and other contexts but by no meaningful definition is a color just a single value.

Before you double down on your definition: the implication is that your definition doesn't make much sense and to demonstrate it from a different angle: how precise are you going to measure these? Let's say a common blue has the saturation of 63%, would 64% quality as a new color? What about 63.2%? Where do you draw the line? And if you have to draw lines anyway, why not choose a meaningful way as in defining "blue" as one color?

c/agedlikemilk

POV: It's 5pm already but still Wednesday

This doesn't really work because colors are a spectrum. You can split and merge existing colors like using a single word for blue and green (like Japanese) or distinguish between light and dark blue (like Italian) but "light blue" isn't a new color. It's part of the blue spectrum

Reddit ain't got no fact checkers as good as me apparently

I've fact checked it and it seems to be legit

I thought they went extinct long before 1915?

• yesn't

Good to know. Thanks!

I know about revitalization efforts for Irish Gaelic but doesn't the majority speak English?

That's called "raw dogging". Am I using it right?