lugal

I love the implication that the therapist isn't sure if the patient is talking about themselves or someone else

Makes me wonder what illegal school think of it

Was it a white moderate? Because they have historically always been the best allies

HLI

It's always a disaster to open Microsoft Windows no matter where you are

Ist wahrscheinlich auch das Nährstoffreichste am ganzen Produkt. Schachtel öffenen und trotzdem mitessen. Dann können sie dir nichts

Mehr wie: wenn er sich einem gefallen tun will

Try old school: "I'm your obedient slave"

Gegen den Faschismus hier im Land

The last panel is a fantasy by the artist.

This might come as a surprise, but the whole comic is. If you read the first 3 panels as being historically accurate, I see where your confusion comes from.

Anyway, you have a very unimaginative and literal approach to all this and that's just not the layer the comic communicates on. Maybe at least acknowledge that.

It is impossible to for a second party tell a first party that they have been unsuccessful in imagining something.

Looking at the last panel, I can say with certainty, that dude failed at the task.

It is inherently a counting problem because of how sight and color recognition functions.

It's, again, no question of sight and color recognition but about imagination.

You're still looking that the comic from a very wrong angle and say "it makes no sense". Well, from my angle, it does.

It's a thought experiment, reminds me of zen Buddhist koans. "What is the sound of one clapping hand?" or "What did your face look like before your parents were born?" don't have an answer. You can tell me you know the answer and I can't proof you wrong but that's not the point. It's about making people think. "Imagine a color you never saw" is the same. You can tell me you made it and maybe that would mean enlightenment for you but it's beside the point. It's a thought experiment obviously meant to have no answer (again, look at the last panel). The more you tell me that makes no sense and there is no answer, you're proofing my point. The comic makes it explicit that there is no answer. You impose a very different meaning onto it that doesn't lead to anything and say "the comic doesn't lead to anything".