Ok next question, because I think I interpreted the term differently than you did.
There are two types of term limits right? Quantity of terms, and length of terms.
Status quo: Q - one term, L - for life.
Wouldn't limiting the length but not the quantity maintain the incentive for impartiality? So there is no concept of a second term?
I'm not trolling btw, I'm looking for an honest airing of the Q.
ELI5, How does no term limits allow for impartiality?
I'm one of the people who doesn't have a little voice. It weirds me out that other people do.
Fuck it. Lawless as Bond!!
I want a dark post apocalyptic Logan style Bond with Pierce Brosnan. Take the franchise into a hard left turn for just one movie.
Dilution is the solution to this pollution
As a practitioner of the dark arts, I recommend trying it once.
Couldn't agree more brother. The concept of Riker's Beard is well known in TV - although it is hard to implement in the age of streaming. But I want new and untried.
LD really broke the mold and is fantastic. DISCO's issue is that it wasn't different enough.
I want Horror in the ST universe. I want James Bond in ST (Section 31?). I want How I Met Your Mother in ST. I want Law and Order in ST. I want MASH in ST. I want Saved By The Bell in ST(Academy?) I want The Hurt Locker in ST. I want The Notebook in ST. That's how the franchise moves on, not retreading old ground.
I'm doing a DISCO rewatch right now. It is much better on a second run than I remember it being when it first came out.
For an Internet discussion, I really appreciate your open and honest exchange. Good day fellow Internet person.