lloydsmart

joined 2 years ago
[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Thanks for the detailed reply. I hadn't considered the difference between money and currency before. Maybe I still don't fully understand it because I still think there would be an advantage to hoarding currency in any system where others are prepared to exchange goods or labour for that currency.

Trade would surely still occur, and it would be possible to profit from said trade. That profit would enable the trader to live a more luxurious life than those who make less or no profit, because he would be able to acquire more goods and have more work done for him by spending the profit. Consumerism would happen.

Even in a post-scarciry world I think we'd still have Ferengi.

I appreciate the reading recommendations. These are some fascinating ideas to understand for sure.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (21 children)

You're right, I don't have much knowledge of anarchism's philosophical framework, but I do know that the definition of the word means that there is no authority.

In an anarchist society, what's to stop me from accumulating wealth?

Furthermore, what would stop me from entering into voluntary contracts with others who agree to do labour in exchange for money?

Ultimately I think that without some authority (almost certainly a state) enforcing communism, the relationships we currently experience under capitalism will naturally reoccur. And (if my limited understanding of anarchy is correct, which I admit it might not be), under anarchism there can be no such authority preventing capitalism from happening.

Communism always needs to be enforced, it doesn't happen naturally. Capitalism does. That's why I don't think communism can exist along with anarchy.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I actually do have seven bins.

  1. Cans and plastic
  2. Paper and cardboard
  3. Glass
  4. Food waste
  5. Garden waste
  6. Black bags "normal" waste
  7. Yellow bags hygiene waste (nappies etc.)

Monmouthshire.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (26 children)

How can you have communism without a state forcing everyone to surrender their property?

If private property exists, that's not communism. But to enforce communism you need a state so that's not anarchy.

I believe anarchy and communism are polar opposites, and cannot co-exist. You're either for anarchy (which ultimately leads to individualism and capitalism) or communism, which requires a huge controlling state to exist.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

I use Mail-in-a-Box on a VM at home. Static IP from my ISP. Been working well for years now. I recommend it.

If your IP isn't trusted you could always use an SMTP relay somewhere else.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

🎶Anyone can see 🎶

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They may be the biggest installer of renewable energy, but what percentage of their electricity comes from renewables? If they're installing more coal than renewables then it's still not better.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They're also deploying coal faster than anyone else.

I've heard this argument before about the efficiency of burning centrally, usually in a European context to defend running EVs on a grid powered mostly by natural gas, but not for coal.

Now I'm genuinely curious whether efficiently burning coal to power EVs is less bad for the environment than burning petrol in ICE cars. Is there any research on that?

I agree that ultimately EVs are the future, and I do drive one myself and strive to charge it on renewables whenever possible. However, in places with dirtier grids I'm not sure they're a great idea.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I like Mailinabox

You can use it in the cloud or fully self-host on your own hardware if you want. (Assuming your ISP allows this)

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Yes, this is vitally important. Switching from petrol to EVs will be a net negative for the environment if all that energy comes from burning coal.

They have to clean up their grid, which unfortunately isn't happening at the moment. They're building new coal plants.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

Well, that's not ideal, but the oil and gas platforms have to be powered by something. They'll exist either way, but without these turbines they'd be powered by oil and gas.

Power demand is power demand. If we get all precious about who can use our wind power, they're not just gonna go "ok, I guess we'll shut down these oil rigs" 🤷‍♂️

view more: ‹ prev next ›