littleguy

https://www.sss.gov/register/benefits-and-penalties/

A man who fails to register may be ineligible for opportunities important to his future. He must register to be eligible for state-funded student financial aid and employment in many states, most federal employment, job training under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and U.S. citizenship for immigrant men.

If required to register, failure to register is a felony punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or 5 years imprisonment. Also, a person who knowingly counsels, aids, or abets another to fail to comply with the registration requirement is subject to the same penalties.

Sure seems unfair to punish one sex for not filling out "irrelevant paperwork" and not the other. Almost like, in this instance, one sex has fewer rights than the other.

Someone clarified that pregnant women have fewer rights than men, which also means they have fewer rights than women who are not pregnant. Without getting into that discussion, I'd like to know how you think women who aren't pregnant have fewer rights than men in the US.

If it's just "irrelevant paperwork," then why do we have men do it and not women?

No it won't be.

Programming will always be giving instructions to execute a task.

I haven't tripped since AI was a thing, but I doubt it.

The best images while tripping are the ones in our head.

Did you notice you get more support from one sex over the other?

I find it hard to believe that the average male would be more willing to care about a transperson's feelings over another male's. I can easily see the average female being the opposite, though.

So true. I'm sorry you're getting downvoted for this.

It just proves your point further. Men are expendable.

I dunno, for me it's painfully obvious what the correct social media successors are.

Lemmy for reddit.

Friendica for facebook.

Pixelfed for instagram.

Mastodon for twitter.

Matrix for discord.

Peertube for youtube.

No.

The distinction is important, and every useful idiot pivoting from one corporate platform to another should be educated on their mistake.

The problem is that we're no longer discussing his original point. The goalposts have been moved.

If we're talking specifically about pregnant women, then he should've said that so people understand that's what he was referring to.

Trying to paint it as "all women" because sometimes some women are pregnant is disingenuous. It tells me that he's avoiding telling the truth because it hurts his argument.

Don't listen to this person.

He's part of a culture that can't tolerate people doing things differently from him.