lightnsfw

joined 2 years ago
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Its more perverted to want to control what other people are jacking to than it is to jack it to porn games. Keep your perversions to yourselves weirdos.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 5 days ago

Myself and many others were doing those things when we were 14 too. It doesn't mean we should have been fucking grown adults. Those adults would have been taking advantage of us. It was the same back in your day. The dudes getting with teenagers by buying them alcohol and cigarettes were creeps. Regardless of how "accepted" it was back then.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 9 points 5 days ago

So turn off the check box that shows you porn games....

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

That's right, I'm torrenting all this stuff for my AI program...

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com -5 points 1 week ago

Biden couldn’t have released them without violating the court order that sealed them

Presidents can do whatever they want as long as it's an official act.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Know when they come home or if they are stuck in traffic

Look at maps and see how traffic is on their route if they're late

“oh you are still in the store can you get me …”

Tell each other when you are going to the store beforehand and ask if you need anything.

security if they get kidnapped

Very unlikely to happen in the first place and competent kidnappers would toss their phone right away anyway.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

I don't own a gun, I am 100x more likely to use it on myself than need it for self defense where I'm at. But the scenario I'm describing, whether or not the home invader has a gun or not doesn't matter, the simple fact that they are invading your home in the first place justifies lethal force. You could be injured/killed by them even without them having a gun so the safest option for the resident is shoot them immediately. The resident should not have to accept any level of risk whatsoever in dealing with this situation. You're not getting a gun because someone might attack you with a gun. You're getting a gun because someone might attack you.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You don't own a gun in case of a burglar having a gun. It's in case of home invasion period. I'm not going to wait around to determine if they're armed or not and I'm not going to restrict myself to some lesser means of stopping them just because they aren't. I didn't create this situation and I am not going to accept risk to myself to preserve the life of some asshole who doesn't even respect me enough not to break into my home.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then they post about how the gun owners aren't doing anything to stop the fascist government. Yea, you've been alienating them for decades. They're not on your side.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Yea, tons of stuff like that is why I did things the way I did. If I start at the beginning instead of trying to jump around and figure out where you messed up it's usually much more efficient. There were people who I was confident in their ability enough to skip around but if they were new to me we were going to cover the entire process to be sure.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool I can't do that without thinking about my job either. Thinking about your job isn't work unless you fuckers want to start paying for it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›