lena

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
reactionmemes
Couplememes
gregtech
sorted by: new top controversial old
>w< chillin'~ in c/femboy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, so pretty!

I basically only play minecraft on a server with some friends. We have a voice chat plugin and it's great.

Otherwise I haven't been playing games a lot, I've been mostly programming :3

I wish I had programmer socks, I'd love to post on !unixsocks@lemmy.blahaj.zone but I don't have any :(

The Coca-Cola boycott may have caused this ad in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I really like Cockta, used to be owned by a Slovenian company, currently by Croatians. Still european!

Should we opt out of Lemvotes? in c/div0_governance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not exactly sure what you want here.

  1. If you'd like votes to not be federated at all, that would mean instances would only have the local count of votes (i.e. only votes cast by users from that instance), which brings little benefit, and would make small instances unusable.

  2. If you'd like only vote counts to be federated, but not who cast the votes, that would allow people to make accounts spamming votes, with admins from other instances being unable to figure out where the spurious votes are coming from. As in the previous example, it would bring little benefit (votes would be private, sure), but it would cripple moderation tools and make post and comment ranking untrustworthy because of potential (virtually) undetectable bots.

HTTP Cats in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This is great, DEFCON talks are always amazing :D

The one about email is also great.

The EU still wants to scan all your chats – and the rules could come into force by October 2025 in c/technology@lemmy.world
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Or matrix, which I prefer. XMPP has a myriad of issues, and matrix is more modern with a better ecosystem of clients and servers.

HTTP Cats in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 2 points 15 hours ago

I already use it in Lemvotes and it's quite funny

The older generation 🙄 in c/memes@lemmy.world
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jerk, I'd say, though that would be shaking shaking my head, not shaking my head my head

You have the ability to kill any person by touching them for 15 seconds (uninterrupted), how do you use this power? (You get to choose the timing of death and cause of death) in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'd shake hands with fascists

The older generation 🙄 in c/memes@lemmy.world
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I am

Yeah in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 4 points 1 day ago

Their CI/CD minutes are very generous (unlimited!). Plus, if Microsoft wanted to scrape code, it doesn't have to be on Github. They can scrape it off codeberg too. And I can be sure Github won't shut down.

If Github does decide to screw users over, switching to self-hosted forgejo would be trivial.

Yeah in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it says 27 >:(

Sean Astin knows his fashion rules in c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 8 points 1 day ago

Gotta flex those pecs

101
HTTP Cats (http.cat)
 

cross-posted from: https://gregtech.eu/post/16825706

API for HTTP Cats

268
HTTP Cats (http.cat)
 

API for HTTP Cats

4
Status Update: July 2025 | Telodendria (telodendria.org)
40
Wat (www.destroyallsoftware.com)
7
The Flaws of Inheritance (youtu.be)
 

This is an amazing explanation of inheritance

67
What's your biggest regret? (gregtech.eu)
101
one hundred ninety six issues rule (infosec.pub)
 

on the voyager Github

I have to open the 197th one 😭

4
How can I prevent JSON from being unmarshaled into a field of a struct in Go? (gregtech.eu)
 

cross-posted from: https://gregtech.eu/post/16712875

Marshaling the field is fine, so using the tag json:"-" won't work. I could use the UnmarshalJSON method on the struct, but I have no idea how to implement it.

I'd rather not make a duplicate of the struct with that field removed, as it causes quite a bit of code duplication, and it's pretty chaotic.

7
How can I prevent JSON from being unmarshaled into a field of a struct? (gregtech.eu)
 

Marshaling the field is fine, so using the tag json:"-" won't work. I could use the UnmarshalJSON method on the struct, but I have no idea how to implement it.

I'd rather not make a duplicate of the struct with that field removed, as it causes quite a bit of code duplication, and it's pretty chaotic.

461
Furries are cool (infosec.pub)
11
What's the best way for testing Gin routes in Go? (gregtech.eu)
 

cross-posted from: https://gregtech.eu/post/16416819

Hi, what's the best way for testing a gin route?

I currently have one function where the routes are defined. Here it is:

package router

import (
	"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
	"github.com/gragorther/epigo/handlers"
	"github.com/gragorther/epigo/middlewares"
)

func Setup(userUserStore handlers.UserUserStore, groupGroupStore handlers.GroupGroupStore, groupAuthStore handlers.GroupAuthStore, messageAuthStore handlers.MessageAuthStore, messageMessageStore handlers.MessageMessageStore, middlewareUserStore middlewares.UserStore) *gin.Engine {
	r := gin.Default()
	r.Use(middlewares.ErrorHandler())

	userHandler := handlers.NewUserHandler(userUserStore)
	authHandler := middlewares.NewAuthMiddleware(middlewareUserStore)
	groupHandler := handlers.NewGroupHandler(groupGroupStore, groupAuthStore)
	messageHandler := handlers.NewMessageHandler(messageMessageStore, messageAuthStore)

	// user stuff
	r.POST("/user/register", userHandler.RegisterUser)
	r.POST("/user/login", userHandler.LoginUser)
	r.GET("/user/profile", authHandler.CheckAuth, userHandler.GetUserProfile)
	r.PUT("/user/setEmailInterval", authHandler.CheckAuth, userHandler.SetEmailInterval)

	// groups
	r.DELETE("/user/groups/delete/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.DeleteGroup)
	r.POST("/user/groups/add", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.AddGroup)
	r.GET("/user/groups", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.ListGroups) // list groups
	r.PATCH("/user/groups/edit/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.EditGroup)

	// lastMessages
	r.POST("/user/lastMessages/add", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.AddLastMessage)
	r.GET("/user/lastMessages", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.ListLastMessages)
	r.PATCH("/user/lastMessages/edit/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.EditLastMessage)
	r.DELETE("/user/lastMessages/delete/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.DeleteLastMessage)
	return r
}

so, my question is, how can I test just one route? should I run this function in every test and send a request to a route with httptest? Or should I set up my handlers like it's described at https://gin-gonic.com/en/docs/testing/

(like this)

func postUser(router *gin.Engine) *gin.Engine {
  router.POST("/user/add", func(c *gin.Context) {
    var user User
    c.BindJSON(&user)
    c.JSON(200, user)
  })
  return router
}

let me know if you have any other questions about my code.

It's available on github: https://github.com/gragorther/epigo

6
What's the best way for testing Gin routes in Go? (gregtech.eu)
 

cross-posted from: https://gregtech.eu/post/16416819

Hi, what's the best way for testing a gin route?

I currently have one function where the routes are defined. Here it is:

package router

import (
	"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
	"github.com/gragorther/epigo/handlers"
	"github.com/gragorther/epigo/middlewares"
)

func Setup(userUserStore handlers.UserUserStore, groupGroupStore handlers.GroupGroupStore, groupAuthStore handlers.GroupAuthStore, messageAuthStore handlers.MessageAuthStore, messageMessageStore handlers.MessageMessageStore, middlewareUserStore middlewares.UserStore) *gin.Engine {
	r := gin.Default()
	r.Use(middlewares.ErrorHandler())

	userHandler := handlers.NewUserHandler(userUserStore)
	authHandler := middlewares.NewAuthMiddleware(middlewareUserStore)
	groupHandler := handlers.NewGroupHandler(groupGroupStore, groupAuthStore)
	messageHandler := handlers.NewMessageHandler(messageMessageStore, messageAuthStore)

	// user stuff
	r.POST("/user/register", userHandler.RegisterUser)
	r.POST("/user/login", userHandler.LoginUser)
	r.GET("/user/profile", authHandler.CheckAuth, userHandler.GetUserProfile)
	r.PUT("/user/setEmailInterval", authHandler.CheckAuth, userHandler.SetEmailInterval)

	// groups
	r.DELETE("/user/groups/delete/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.DeleteGroup)
	r.POST("/user/groups/add", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.AddGroup)
	r.GET("/user/groups", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.ListGroups) // list groups
	r.PATCH("/user/groups/edit/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.EditGroup)

	// lastMessages
	r.POST("/user/lastMessages/add", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.AddLastMessage)
	r.GET("/user/lastMessages", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.ListLastMessages)
	r.PATCH("/user/lastMessages/edit/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.EditLastMessage)
	r.DELETE("/user/lastMessages/delete/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.DeleteLastMessage)
	return r
}

so, my question is, how can I test just one route? should I run this function in every test and send a request to a route with httptest? Or should I set up my handlers like it's described at https://gin-gonic.com/en/docs/testing/

(like this)

func postUser(router *gin.Engine) *gin.Engine {
  router.POST("/user/add", func(c *gin.Context) {
    var user User
    c.BindJSON(&user)
    c.JSON(200, user)
  })
  return router
}

let me know if you have any other questions about my code.

It's available on github: https://github.com/gragorther/epigo

view more: next ›