leftytighty
That's not true either... Bitcoin scams are busted all the time. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency_tracing
It's not unlike tracking down a pirate radio signal, someone has to care and invest the resources into it.
Piracy is a good example, they pop up and they get taken down. Child sex abuse material is the same. We regulate content on the Internet.
You're falling for some BS propaganda from huge tech companies that profit off user submitted content arguing that they can't possibly manage their platforms properly.
Nobody said shitting out your garbage opinion on every huge web platform is an inalienable right (ironic?). We can hold YouTube and Meta accountable for their platforms' content.
If I call a TV station and spew racism on air they'll still get a fine.
The "younger generation" might be naive to think unwillingness to regulate is the same as inability to regulate.
I hope you realize Bitcoin isn't untraceable.
Ontario has nearly twice as many cases and it's present all over Canada
You can never completely regulate what people print and distribute so there's no point regulating newspapers.
You can never completely regulate people broadcasting radio messages so it's pointless to have broadcast standards.
His quote is one sentence, and if you hold on to the end (I know, it's hard) you'll see your answer.
"We're calling on the Prime Minister to sell his investments, turn them into cash, hand them to a trustee who can invest them in a way that is completely blind to him so that he does not have any knowledge of what he owns," Poilievre said.
I wish people would stop rushing to shit their opinions out based on headlines
Votes are private
I don't disagree, I asked my rhetorical question because this "forest management" argument is often being made in bad faith by right wing climate deniers who also scoff at government spending.
We can extrapolate your logic to climate action at large. Stop meat and dairy related subsidies, stop fossil infrastructure, invest in alternative and sustainable systems even if there's an apparent short term cost.
It'll be cheaper than what's coming...
It's an ROI thing, as people are pointing out. You're hand waving that part away. A small business has to weigh an small annual fee and loss of control against buying expensive hardware and paying the salary of one or more IT professionals to maintain their in house systems. This also scales with the size of the company and their data, it's expensive for a small company to buy one or two servers and storage solutions, it's expensive for a big company to buy 20 of the same.
You also lose out on off-site backups (without more investment of course) and global availability. Will every company that has a global team roll out servers in every global region? Small companies can have global teams as well.
It's simply not cost effective for everyone to have their own infrastructure. Cloud infrastructure is the same as any other infrastructure, it is cheaper to pool resources and share
Call it ethnic cleansing at least you cowards