leftytighty

joined 11 months ago
[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

In retrospect they'll probably feel violence was justified. How many time machine scenarios will amount to ecoterrorism in the same way that we imagine we'd kill Hitler today

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

How do you propose to measure a movie's success at pleasing fans?

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

ok but that's paranoia, who's to say your faked gait won't get someone else hanged then?

gait isn't proof of identity, if they're gonna do that they can just round you up anyway

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Has anyone ever been successfully prosecuted based on gait?

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 days ago

Nobody is saying he wasn't targeting them....

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The person is questioning the motivation (with pretty solid points), that doesn't mean it was an accident. Ironically, your accusation just called your own reading comprehension and reasoning into question while you're calling this dude brain dead

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

We were merely partying with Nazis

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 70 points 3 days ago (6 children)

To add to this, an outside observer would say humans think their pets are little humans, throwing birthday parties, dressing them in clothing, talking to them.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

You don't make policy based on the threat of a small number of bad actors. What evidence is there that a significant amount of criminals and bad actors are infiltrating Canada for nefarious purposes by lying?

Until there's reason to believe there's a problem, it's paranoia and prejudice

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The "centrist" / just asking questions approach to questioning established gender science will be looked on just as badly as people "just asking questions" with race pseudoscience like phrenology.

At a certain point the question itself represents bigotry. "Are non-white races less intelligent?" is no longer treated as a scientific question, but rather just a bigoted loaded question.

You're just slow on the uptake, which I guess is the literal definition of a conservative.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Gender science isn't a political opinion no matter how much you people try to make science into politics.

You being icked out by trans people doesn't change that transition is the best treatment for reducing their suicide rates and giving them a chance at happiness.

Do you think these people would put themselves through that, knowing that there are thousands of people like you out there trying to destroy and erase them, if it was a whim they got because they saw a rainbow flag at school?

You can't both sides reality.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 days ago

I can just barely understand avoiding the term genocide but what Israel is doing and proposing to do further is textbook ethnic cleansing and is equally egregious. We can't even officially call it ethnic cleansing. There's zero ambiguity on that definition.

view more: next ›