kyub

joined 2 years ago
[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
  1. Arch

  2. For gaming, ~7 years. For everything else, ~20 years. I've used Windows for gaming in the past, but I've been a long-time Arch user in general, who switched to Linux full-time (also for gaming) once it got so compatible with running Windows-based games. Which was approx. 7 years ago. Since then, I don't have any Windows partitions anymore.

  3. For gaming, really minor things only sometimes, and that amount also decreased over time as the compatibility layers and tools got better and better. I think Linux is in general very newcomer/mainstream-friendly for gaming and general use right now, just pick the right distro for you. Since I'm on Arch, I obviously have to put in slightly more time, and I wouldn't recommend Arch to new users, unless that new user is also willing to enjoy the benefits of having a technically simple and lean OS while not caring about the disadvantages (having to invest slightly more time into it). That said, I also usually game on Steam and don't play games with invasive anti-cheat-systems in them. Which makes it even easier.

  4. No.

For newcomers, best picks for a gaming-optimized Linux distro right now would be Bazzite, Nobara or simply any general-use but up to date distro like Fedora, Pop!OS, Kubuntu, OpenSuSE, CachyOS, EndeavourOS, Arch (the last three only if you can deal with the Arch-based distros, it's not for everyone). If you have a designated gaming machine, I'd probably use a gaming-centric distro. If you also use the machine for other tasks, I'd pick a general-use distro which can do gaming just fine as well. There's really no difference in capability between the two types other than what's already preconfigured OOTB and how fast you can go from zero to gaming.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The key people from the Trump administration and their key supporters need to be jailed for their complete disregard of the constitution and laws. If you can't stop them your justice system is broken. Any regular citizen doing a tiny percentage of what these criminals do would already be jailed for life. Enforce the laws and the constitution. Put those criminals where they belong.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well, they massively expanded jail space everywhere, as well as funding for ICE. Of course they're going after much more people than just "illegal immigrants". That's just the low-hanging fruit for them (still anti-constitutional). Fascists will always move on to other groups of people because they constantly need to find new enemies, not realizing that they themselves are the only ones causing actual harm. They will also turn on each other if someone blames another one of "treason" or "aiding the enemy" or whatever. It's a purely destructive cult-like force and if you can't stop it it will cost millions of lives over a couple of years.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 weeks ago

A pigeon is strictly better than Trump because they don't destroy the environment, societal and scientific progress, or other people. Now that I've thought about it 1 second more, it's not even a fair comparison. Because Trump existing means active harm and destruction in many areas.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

"The US will always do the right thing... after having exhausted all other possibilities."

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago

Well, the point in time where it was maybe possible to defend against Trump and his cronies normally or legally is already over. Now they have gathered too much power and also already pretty much operate above the law. The Supreme Court is on their side I guess, not on the side of the constitution or the laws anymore. So it'll only get worse from now on, and quickly. Only regime-approved media will soon be left over, i.e. media distributing the regime's propaganda even further. And they will soon throw all of their opponents into concentration camps, not just "illegal immigrants". That's just the low-hanging fruit they needed for initially starting building concentration camps and expanding other jail space and their ICE army massively. Technically they would only need jail space for themselves and all supporters of this fascist regime, but they will jail all others they can get their hands on instead.

You will have an actual fight on your hands if you want to revert all this. Either just from the inside, or both from the inside and the outside once they start waging war on former allies like Canada or Denmark (Greenland). You should probably create local communities of people who are ready to help each other vs. ICE raids. Create logistical and resource problems for them. Make it hard and costly for them to destroy people's lives. If you let them kidnap too many people, you will not have enough people for resistance anymore.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

It's like a reverse independence day this year... the non-US world declares its independence from the US. But maybe next year, or hopefully in a very short amount of years, the US can celebrate its independence or liberation from fascism at least, maybe also from neo-liberalism. But first, fascism is hitting your with full deadly and extralegal force.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not sure there will be a big change there, because they are already powerful enough for most common tasks since several years now. And everyone owns at least one phone or tablet already. So I don't think that number is going to rise significantly anymore. Those people who are OK with using a phone/tablet for everything probably already do so right now. Maybe if living conditions for the non-super-rich become worse and people look for more affordable computing devices. But even then, older devices which can run Linux desktops for example are already dirt-cheap. I just don't think that the UI/UX of phones or tablets is on par with desktops or notebooks running a regular desktop OS when using a big screen. Those UIs are primarily made for touch and for smaller screens. Trying to do everything with just one UI paradigm just leads to Windows 8 ugliness.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That, and also this might just be a fake PR stunt to make the Trump administration not seem so wrong (although achieving that would be like a sky-high wall climb with a big overhang). Remember that both Elon and Trump only really care about getting richer. Anything they say doesn't have much substance to it. It's all about facilitating their goals. If they feel like they need to do a 180-degree turn in order to boost their public perception, they will do that. I don't think they have much integrity, spine, morals or ethics at all. That would just stand in the way of getting richer.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Desktop Linux' marketshare is going to steadily increase, but as time progresses, so will the speed of that increase. Linux was at or below 1% for a really long time but within the last 5 years or so it jumped to ~5%. As this not only means more users, but also more attention and developers, this will of course snowball. The end of Win10 will also give a bump. And if the enshittification of Windows continues (it probably will) and if US-based companies are becoming a red flag for non-US-customers (will probably also happen) then it will snowball even faster.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist

Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist

Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist

Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew

Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

— Martin Niemöller

Adapted for the fascist regime in USA today, it should probably go like this:

First they came for the illegal immigrants
And I did not speak out
Because I was not an illegal immigrant

Then they came for the legal immigrants
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a legal immigrant

Then they came for the political opposition
And I did not speak out
Because I was not in the political opposition

Then they came for anyone not loyal on social media
And I did not speak out
Because I was not on social media

Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

—Someone who survived what's to come

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The old question of "what happens when Linus/other senior kernel dev dies" mattered far more like 20+ years ago than it does now. The kernel developers are organized quite well, Linux is in general an extremely well-organized open source project these days, and there are several who could fill in. Linus' "2nd" is Greg Kroah-Hartman, who is the lead maintainer of the stable kernel branch (i.e. the one most are using). Linus is the lead maintainer of the in-development branch.

But of course we hope that Linus continues doing this for a long time. Most people never create even one world-changing technology, Linus casually created two (Linux + Git).

view more: ‹ prev next ›