kryptonianCodeMonkey

joined 2 years ago
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Trump [...] ~~has an extraordinary eye for detail~~ has the tacky taste of a Florida grandma from the 90s who won money on some scratchers.

FTFY

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

If they need assurance for themselves that they are straight, then you are right, they are likely not. However much of the most extreme gender and sexual expression (primarily masculinity and heterosexuality, but not exclusively) is cultural and performative, and certain groups expect you to uphold that performance at all times, and reject anything that would be counter to it.

That is the idea behind toxic masculinity, for example. It isn't that masculinity is bad. It is the that the cultural expectations and barriers and hyper-fixation on masculinity are bad.

The same applies to sexual orientation sometimes. There can be cultural expectation and conformity that comes with your declared orientation, and failing to conform can have consequences in some groups. So it's not necessarily about appearing straight to hide your secret gayness, but may in fact be about appearing straight becuase doing anything outside of those expectations may have social consequences. For example, a heterosexual man giving another man a friendly hug or platonically holding his hand can cause people to question his role in their social circle. It doesn't have to be about his actual orientation at all.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

A pink light shining on a penis will cause it to permanently lose all function and eventually fall off.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He already has towers with his logo on them...

No. But in college, we had a pub we would go to for dinner on Wednesday every week with the same group of friends, with the occasional tag along. Does that count?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not "shit." That's just an over correction to its relative success for its mediocrity. Excluding the visuals, it's fine. It's not stellar, not terrible, just... fine. Simple. There are plenty of worse movie plots, dialogue and acting out there. It's nowhere near unwatchable.

It's a vehicle for the visuals and technology showcasing on a basic film frame, yes. But, it's allowed to be really good at one thing and appreciated for that.

Like a plain chip in some bomb-ass dip. You could've scooped it on a dirty shoe and someone would have licked it clean. But, you gave me a plain chip instead, which is better... even if boring. So, thanks.

dirt flying out of a deep hole one shovel full at a time

Cousin Felicia does have legs for days...

For sure. I just meant who is going to actually bring a challenge to that policy/law in reality. Who has any interest in hiring and paying for legal representation, court fees, etc. to make a judge rule on it?

 

This is from the last election in 2020. How fun that it's still relevant!

view more: next ›