Correct - that was a typo, I've corrected the original post. Not a good idea to write a report when you're angry and tired... ๐คฃ
The firewall (Network Security Group in Oracle lingo) is indeed attached to the subnet. I think I've solved the issue, will write it in a seperate post and link it to the original post.
What happened?
Hedgedoc is a competent selfhostable alternative. V2.0 is around the corner.
Isn't their offering on storage go from infinite to 10 gb? Also it isn't foss... yet
Good find.
I am running Caddy through docker (with sudo docker-compose up, yml is listed above). I know, sudo:ing docker isn't best practice, but I'm learning the ropes in a non-production enviorment ๐ Also, I verified that docker is running as root by ps -eo euser,ruser,suser,fuser,f,comm,label |grep caddy
As for the docker version, I verified it by inspecting the image ID and saw that the image version is 2.7.2:
"Labels": {
"org.opencontainers.image.description": "a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go",
"org.opencontainers.image.documentation": "https://caddyserver.com/docs",
"org.opencontainers.image.licenses": "Apache-2.0",
"org.opencontainers.image.source": "https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy-docker",
"org.opencontainers.image.title": "Caddy",
"org.opencontainers.image.url": "https://caddyserver.com",
"org.opencontainers.image.vendor": "Light Code Labs",
"org.opencontainers.image.version": "v2.7.2"
}
It seems that my next step is to look into the issue why dockerized-Caddy can't communicate with Tailscale. Now I have a direction to investigate further into ๐
Is there a reason why you'd recommend Ngnix over Caddy, as Caddy also have the capability to act as a reverse proxy?
And if you have any recommendations on resources where I can expand me knowledge on this topic, I'll be happy to read more.
Thanks again!
Please do, I'd be most grateful for it.
If you have any better suggestion for how I should handle reverse proxying (maybe there's a easier way than through Caddy?), I'm all ears.
I've always percieved Debian as a more dull & outdated version of ubuntu. Bear in mind, this is only my perception. I like to have the latest and greatest, I like things working out of the box, I like new technologies such as Wayland and I think debian appeals to the "slow, stable and .conf-only" people.
Though I belive that debian ideals are more in line with mine than a company driven distro such as Ubuntu or Fedora.
If you like roguelikes, you're in for a treat. Check out Brogue and DCSS.
And if you want to witness some TUI eyecandy without it being a game, ssh git.charm.sh.
YES! Quite entertaining kingdom-sim with lots of weirdness and fun.
Right now, it's a tie between Fedora and Ubuntu.
The desktop experience in Fedora is much smoother than ubuntu (faster, and more things work out of the box, like touchpad gestures in Firefox). I've been with ubuntu since... 05.xx release? So it's a bit of fear of changing habit keeping me back. I'm giving ubuntu another shot at 23.10 release and if it dosen't appeal me, I'll change.
But considering that I like the idea of immutable distros, I should learn NixOS. But considering the potential learning curve, I should go with Silverblue or ubuntu core when it's out.
Correct - that was a typo in this post. The output from
sudo ufw status verboseis however correct.I think I've solved the issue, will write it in a seperate post and link it to the original post.