Idk about the rest but RFE/RL is literally a CIA propaganda outlet. Even the consensus of wikipedia acknowledges this:
"RFE/RL may be biased in some subject areas (particularly through omission of relevant, countervailing facts), and in those areas, it should be attributed in the article body."
Just find a different source.
It's possible that they're functional cookies in the sense of article 5(3) of the ePrivacy directive (so no consent necessary) but still personal data under the GDPR that's processed on the basis of legitimate interest. In that case they would still need to inform users of the processing under article 13 of the GDPR. Though that can usually be done with a less intrusive link to the privacy statement in the footer.
No, because I'm not a sexist creep
He doesn't want to protect protestors. You're forgetting that he and the mayor are in full control of the police officers that are currently beating protestors to pulp. They are totally on board with what is happening, they just want to be the one in control.
This is delusional. Trump doesn't need provocation, he was always going to do this regardless. The "system" you cling to is the same that has allowed him to rise to power and failed to prosecute his crimes many times now.
On the contrary. It's a quote mocking the extent to which the exploitative system of capitalism has entrenched itself in the minds of people, to such a degree that they cannot even consider that a better alternative might exist.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalist_Realism
By the way, buying and selling things isn't generally considered to be capitalism. Capitalism is about controlling private property for the generation of profit.
It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.
I think the fact that you cannot tell if I'm real already demonstrates why we shouldn't normalize posting AI-content unless it's clearly labelled.
But to put your mind at ease, could I maybe link you some furry porn to prove I'm real?
That's why I said "you sound" like that and not "you are". Those two sentences are all you posted. I'm just telling you how they come across to me.
Because you indicate that you don't care if it happens to others as long as it doesn't happen to you.
I think you misread what I linked. They are two different ratings: red (no not use) for older articles and orange (restrictions apply) for anything newer. The verdict that RFE/RL is biased is still current, as was confirmed by the 2024 discussion.
And the question remains: why link to RFE/RL when there are other sources covering the same event that are more broadly trusted?