koper

Err does anyone on the right actually think we have secure borders?

Yes, Trump and his administration keep saying this.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/04/promises-made-promises-kept-border-security-achieved-in-fewer-than-100-days/

"The Invasion of our Country is OVER." https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114088564162922800

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/04/28/100-days-most-secure-border-american-history

Sorry I cannot decipher this post.

I asked ChatGPT and it says he still needs his glasses while not in costume. So that settles this debate.

/s

Yikes. Telling non-binary people to go to tumblr? I expected better from this community.

These are not remotely the same. The effects of Musk's cuts are monstrous and will lead to countless preventable deaths. Don't dismiss that criticism just because it's coming from Gates.

Fun fact, the can opener was invented more than 80 years after people started putting food in tin cans.

Read the article, it's in the second paragraph.

Don't worry, DOGE will just fire the investigators before that happens.

Nerve gas also doesn't have morals. It just kills people in a horrible way. Does that mean that we shouldn't study their effects or debate whether they should be used?

At least when you drop a bomb there is no doubt about your intent to kill. But if you use a chatbot to defraud consumers, you have plausible deniability.

That was only my first point. In my second and third point I explained why education is not going to solve this problem. That's like poisoning their candy and then educating them about it.

I'll add to say that these AI applications only work because people trust their output. If everyone saw them for the cheap party tricks that they are, they wouldn't be used in the first place.

The fact that they lack sentience or intentions doesn't change the fact that the output is false and deceptive. When I'm being defrauded, I don't care if the perpetrator hides behind an LLM or not.