Well I was gonna up vote your comment but you've made a persuasive argument
kofe
joined 2 years ago
Well good luck to you out there Pat. I believe in you. You'll slay the chaos demon someday
Oh, ok you're illiterate, my apologies.
Show me you can read my first comment, please.
This comment has nothing to do with your original comment, but if you need me to tie together how his misogyny hurts young men that follow him we can go over that
Women wear make up ONLY to signal sexual arousal. Healthy women want kids (so do unhealthy women; healthy women can also want kids). "Sorry, not beautiful" about a woman. Telling people on Twitter to off themselves.
The dude is in trouble for calling himself a neuroscientist and evolutionary biologist ffs. I mean, do I need to go on? Or do you think it's fair to say that his religious and trans arguments aren't the only issues he's currently facing removal of his licensure over?
Even harkening back to their third party days under Lincoln this isn't true.
I just don't want to go through pregnancy, personally. Love kids but not enough to risk my life and permanent bodily changes. The being poor part is secondary
Because thinking in absolutes isn't scientific. Is it possible some of the reported are lies? Sure. What do we do with that? Verify. But you're phrasing the question in a black and white way, awfully reminiscent of petermanston himself. Do you know people wear lipstick for more reasons than signaling sexual arousal, as an example?
"Peterson shows up after having months to prepare only to admit he's only read Marx's manifesto" FTFY 🙂
Done, thank you
You're telling me you don't just wear the PJs out? Join me my friend