kmaismith

joined 2 years ago
[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Are you suggesting that we shouldn’t be worried about toxically insecure people in power when they are behaving awkwardly? Does an appearance of awkwardness grant automatic innocence?

I have been be intensely awkward with my insecurity in the past, and in my awkwardness i have definitely hurt people. If the victims of my insecurity brushed me off as awkward they would be enabling me to continue to harm others

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When we can expect everyone on the planet to be present in a network the conflict and vitrol would be perpetual. We are not mature enough and all on the same page enough as a species to not resort to mud slinging

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, we’re talking about taking the wealth and distributing it for more constructive purposes, if it doesn’t demolish a handful of fortune 500s in the process we’ve made a mistake. Those fortunes would then be able to be used to take all the workers pointlessly generating wealth for the billionaire class and start working on socially useful ventures

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Can we not bring back old words when they regain relevance?

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

At the risk of sounding like i must be a cheater myself, are you suggesting that once someone cheats they are no longer a human worthy of empathy and nuanced consideration of circumstances?

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, who else was gonna do it?

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Strictly speaking, you don’t. Several denominations tried to throw out the mysticism in the 60s to significant backlash of the congregations. Mainstream denominational seminaries are actually pretty open minded from what i hear.

The triune mysticism can be looked at as an act by many denominations, it can’t be dropped because not enough of us skeptics engage with the religious systems locally to justify changing theology. If official positions becoke “well the trinity isn’t actually…” they risk loosing significant numbers of members. Changing that requires skeptical people to earnestly engage with churches and their congregations.

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

I would like to subscribe to this level of rational social design

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Have you seen the state of American society? In case you didn’t hear it has got so bad we’ve got vigilantes killing CEOs

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This whole story-arc gives first move advantage to the opposition, the oligarchs are being forced to react instead of execute plans as they wish

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Man, that time American politics tried to remove alcohol from its culture was fuckin’ wild

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

For as much as you seem to be opposed to being fucked over by your attitude, you sure seem to be bending over with your words

view more: ‹ prev next ›