kkj

joined 4 months ago
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Israel violates ceasefires before the ink dries and somehow it's Hamas' fault that the ceasefires fail?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Laptops haven't routinely used cylindrical cells in some time. I'm fairly confident that no Chromebook has ever done so.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why wasn't he in the primary, then?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Didn't Adams get kicked out of the party over getting caught taking bribes from the Turkish government?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Because she trafficked children. The DoJ's official story seems to be that Epstein and Maxwell abused children purely for their own edification while hanging out with a bunch of powerful people whom those children later falsely accused of sex crimes out of pure spite.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Cutting her off was definitely rude, but I agree that it's silly to ask everyone you meet if they wrote each book you want to discuss with them.

If you had something like

Alice: I've been researching a guy recently, do you know anything about him?

Bob: I recently read a book about him, have you heard of it?

Alice: I wrote that book.

Bob: Wow, cool to meet you. I really liked your work!

Bob still assumes that Alice didn't write the book until told otherwise, but he doesn't cut her off, and this conversation is perfectly pleasant.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

You were the target of LeanBeefPatty's psyop, and it worked.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Per gigawatt-year.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

You obviously shouldn't use LLMs to think, but they are essentially machines that parrot the average Internet user (or in Grok's case, the average Internet Nazi). Using them to get a tentative guess at what Internet users say isn't the worst idea.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How would you even start to enforce those laws against a company that no longer exists? It's one thing to prevent the AI companies from selling a product that relies on continual support in the first place, but these earbuds will work until the batteries degrade (and theoretically longer if you can manage to replace them without destroying the things) with or without the company's existence. The fact that the user lost the case with no company to replace it doesn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that you can really address legally, unless you make the companies put a certain stock of parts in escrow or something, which seems potentially far more wasteful than the status quo.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Skip Intro has a good series about this.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

She's apparently a good person who's as outraged at his behavior as the rest of us, so maybe don't do that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›