kingofthezyx

Hawaii 🤝 SPAM

Lol what? Is this Marco Rubio's publicist? Anyone who still believes Rubio is competent at this point hasn't been paying attention at all.

Let’s dispel with this fiction that Marco Rubio knows what he’s doing. He doesn't know shit about what he’s doing.

Yes, you're correct but that's why I said it was a "working" definition. When you're a botanist (like many of my former professors) you still use the word vegetable in discussion. They would often teach us about local plants with indigenous uses using plain language like "the Chumash used the leaves of this plant as an important part of their vegetable intake", rather than using some clinical term like "edible plant matter" or whatever.

I was only saying in these contexts, they definitely wouldn't describe fruits as vegetables because fruit are a specific thing to a botanist. They definitely wouldn't describe fungi as vegetables because they are also a specific thing to a botanist (not relevant 😂)

So in a scientific setting the word vegetable is still used, but it is mostly defined by what it's not!

Great post, with one caveat

the closest thing to a definition we have for "vegetable" botanically is "literally all plant life and maybe also some fungi,"

I got my degree in Ecology and Evolution, and we always used a similar working definition but it was "edible parts of a plant which are not fruit." So basically botanically, stems, roots, leaves, flowers, and all subvarieties of those are vegetables. Fruits are fruits. Fungi are fungi.

He is actually a pretty amazing host - better than Alex was in some ways. Extremely personable with the contestants, funny, offers context on some clues because he knows so much, and you can tell the contestants have genuine respect for him because he's been there and succeeded better than anyone.

Sociopath is not a clinically defined term. Sociopath is basically a slang term for a person with anti-social personality disorder (ASPD). ASPD can be one part of a psychopathy diagnosis but they are not the same thing.

Wordle1478 5/6

⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩⬜🟨⬜🟨 
🟩⬜🟩🟨🟩 
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 

It's called a false dichotomy, actually. Basically pretending there are only two sides to an argument (capitalism good, capitalism bad) when there is more nuance. Capitalism good, but... capitalism bad, but... this isn't capitalism... etc.

I'm not saying I necessarily agree with it, but I believe the intention is basically as a deterrent. If you cause $5000 worth of "damages" to someone and they have to sue and win, and the most that can happen is $5000 of repayment, you've basically created an incentive to try to get away with stuff - the worst case scenario would be paying what you owed anyway. If you might have to pay $175k for making 5k, it might make you think twice about taking that chance.

Now the real conversation is actually about whether those kinds of negative incentives are actually related to the decision to commit a crime. I don't have any solid evidence but my gut tells me no - people who are going to commit a crime usually assume they are going to get away with it, don't factor potential outcomes into their risk assessment, or don't have any risk assessment at all.

"When it all comes down, will you say you did everything you could?"

• Rise Against, "The Eco-Terrorist in Me"