Chancellor Leberwurst is softer than a wet paper bag. News at 11.
jmcs
joined 2 years ago
And thats why we have password managers.
As long as Google doesn't sell Chrome to OpenAI.
You can make a relatively tasty rice with beans with canned beans and bit of salt in 10 minutes - if you are feeling fancy adding parsley will even move it to tasting good. I'm starting to suspect all the corn syrup is damaging american's taste buds beyond repair.
Saving money on food to buy a guillotine is personal finance.
Let's pretend for a second that the TSA is not a circus meant to appease people that are not paying too much attention being performed by an organisation that's effectively an employer of last resort.
The TSA will not even stop people from taking what they would need to make a Molotov cocktail with what they can buy in the airport shop. Their stated goal is not to reduce the risk of incidents to 0 is reducing it to reasonable level with the least disruption to the air travelers as possible - otherwise they would be trying to get people to fly naked and without luggage.
You are seriously misunderstanding TSA's purpose.
And the issue with wireless communications in airplanes was never that it was a huge risk by itself, it was always that there's a small chance that it could increase noise enough that some important communication might potentially be missed or misinterpreted. And there are lots of things that factor in the risk, like power, bands, and the amount of people not following the rules - it's very different to have one person forgetting to shut off the cellular signal on the phone or to have 200 phones on full blast mode trying to reach the nearest antenna.
All airplanes I've been in the last decade explicitly allow Bluetooth - and it's very easy for the staff to see the dozens of people wearing wireless head/earphones. For WiFi it's usually tied to the existence of on-board Internet.
You half answered your question. Different band and very different levels of signal strength.
And there are airplanes that allow wifi, just not all of them yet.
The judge and prosecution in the first trial fucked up by including testimony for crimes Weinstein was not accused of, so the trial needs to be repeated. This is the kind of mistake they do in 90% of the cases but Weinstein can afford lawyers that care.
This is not even an American issue, prosecutors all over the world get used to steam rolling poor fool after poor fool so when they face someone that can afford an adequate defence team they are caught with their pants down more often than not.