jkrtn

joined 2 years ago
[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think those USB cases are priced realistically at all. For what they're asking I may as well just buy hardware to build a NAS box.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is etc the mutable part? Would you have to do this again to add more users after a reboot?

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Just make all fines proportional to net worth. I don't want poors to be fucked for life for the same behavior that an affluenza sufferer would just pay $100k and be done with. Make contempt like 1% of net worth, everyone can choose how much it is worth to act a fool in court.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think Repubs will respect a precedent?

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Well, yeah. They're fine with raping children but draw the line at smoking a plant. That's why they get along so well with the Christians.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, then I'll do it if I don't have to pay for other insurance on the car.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

[Users being treated as owners of their hardware instead of sheep to fleece]

Linux people: oh fuck yeah spread it

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, seen by people visiting EU websites or companies with an EU presence. And because whether or not they assign a cookie is easily verifiable by the person on the other end.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is not to help you control your own machine, the point is trying to force people to subscribe to their own machines.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago

Your dog deserves the title more than Donald does.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

"Donald absolutely could theoretically have a consequence from this action," our not-really-a-lawyer who works in the periphery of that area of law weighs in.

view more: ‹ prev next ›