jj4211

Come on, it's e easy to remember one IPv6 address: ::1

Having the breathing room is great.

You have two teams that independently set up private networks but now someone has to talk to them both?

In IPv4, they likely stepped on the same private subnets. In ipv6, they pretty much certainly did not step in the same ULA prefixes. My VPN setup is a mess of a maze to deal with the fact that most things I connect to are all independently allocated 10. subnets, with the IPv6 focused customer being easiest.

Also, if you want to embed information in your addressing, like vlan I'd or room information.

Besides, you can have addresses like fd37:5f1a:b4c1::feed:face, and that's fun isn't it?

Well sometimes the lla is not predictable, some stacks take privacy addresses to lla, which is silly but they do it. Of course you can multicast ping and check your neighbor table to get the lla chosen in such cases.

But you could do the same thing with a rogue DHCP server I IPv4... With similar methods to prevent the misbehavior on networks

Dubs have gotten better, and the decline of fansubs means no translation notes that really helped some oddities.

But that's correlation, the way the brain conceptualizes it into a "color" in the mental model, well that's the qualia stuff referenced in another comment.

Now there's some x-rays to see..

Success is awarded to the confident. You can be an absolute weird idiot and still, in the right circumstances, get massive success just because people assume there's a reason you seem so confident, and who are they to second guess that confidence?

Add to that half the time someone who is obese and complains of an ailment, let's say muscle pain, they are adamant that it's not the weight. Because the weight is hard to deal with and they need it to be easy.

So yes, someone unfairly has a complaint without being properly heard, but it's in a chorus of people that just won't accept that their obesity is a problem.

Of course, women have a lot more women specific health issues than men have men specific health issues, so it makes sense.

There are certain areas where, as I understand, women are less diagnosed when they should be compared to men (e.g. heart conditions), but in other areas both men and women face a doctor shrugging and moving on rather than arriving at a diagnosis.

The reason for volatility is that any such concept at scale is subject to just the messiest lump of evolving opinions on everything. It will deflate, inflate, deflate wildly because it's utterly subject to the whims of the people without any mechanism to counter a lack of mass consensus on what 'value' is.

We started noticing as things scaled up, there needed to be some regulatory management to counter the whimsical populace. Hard to fight mass inflation or deflation when you can't do anything to manage the "money supply" to offset panic.

He also wraps it up with a bit of climate denial, so he thinks the real problem is imaginary.

Extra mental gymnastics as he interpreted reports of significantly improved pollution when we shut down everything as proof, somehow, that humanity didn't really make that much of a difference... So either a difference is observed and that means it's the rest of the way reversible so it can't be that big of a deal or no difference would've been seen and he would have concluded humanity must not make a difference because no difference was seen..