My what?
jabrd
It’s true. They just love all of the revolutions so much
Marxist-Leninists performing bourgeois revolutions better than any bourgeois party ever could
But think of the productive forces
I wish my dad expressed his sentimental sweetness without talking about how he’ll probably die soon. I wish my mom would express her pride in me without me having to achieve something first
Apps fucking suck and it sucks that every service needs an app and that the more critical the service the worse the app works. Oh I need to download an app to check why my electricity is out and oh the app is incredibly cumbersome and poorly designed and oh after going through three screens and giving you my blood to login it just spits out a “try again later” error no matter what I do? Cool
Clase Azul. My wealthy in laws are cooler than yours
How are we all feeling about those UFC press conferences this weekend? Is Dricus Du Plesis allowed to invoke Sean Strickland’s abusive father because Sean called him the F slur? Is O’Malley able to do the same because Strickland made fun of his open relationship and called him a cuck? Is Chito Vera allowed to drop the R slur because… checks notes his daughter has special needs??
I mean really what the fuck is happening over there. Somehow Colby’s MAGA shtick and referencing Leon Edwards’ late father was the least offensive part of the whole thing. Rooting for Shavkat no matter what tho. Gotta support our former-Soviet bloc bois
Taxing the money back out of the economy is standard Keynesian methodology for how to fight inflation but it’s literally never been successfully implemented because it’s too politically unpopular for anyone to actually do it
The USSR’s foreign policy in the post-Stalin period was one of supporting national liberation movements, especially in relation to the decolonial movements. This process often took on the form of forcing through bourgeois revolutions to proletarianize the peasantry and end feudal relations, thus moving the world closer to the global communism button. We can talk about the outcomes of this all day but it seems like settled fact that the developmentalist approach to nation building as best exemplified in Dengist China (and also this post) is a process of bourgeois-ification of the means of production. It’s been a long standing point of contention in communist theory whether it’s possible to skip developmental stages and - hypothetically - go from feudal relations directly to socialist ones, but historically MLs have sided on the answer that you must complete the loop and go through a bourgeois period before socialism can be achieved. Whether you think this is good or not is for you to hold in your heart but let’s be honest about theoretical traditions