isVeryLoud

My interpretation was that AI companies can train on material they are licensed to use, but the courts have deemed that Anthropic pirated this material as they were not licensed to use it.

In other words, if Anthropic bought the physical or digital books, it would be fine so long as their AI couldn't spit it out verbatim, but they didn't even do that, i.e. the AI crawler pirated the book.

Gist:

What’s new: The Northern District of California has granted a summary judgment for Anthropic that the training use of the copyrighted books and the print-to-digital format change were both “fair use” (full order below box). However, the court also found that the pirated library copies that Anthropic collected could not be deemed as training copies, and therefore, the use of this material was not “fair”. The court also announced that it will have a trial on the pirated copies and any resulting damages, adding:

“That Anthropic later bought a copy of a book it earlier stole off the internet will not absolve it of liability for the theft but it may affect the extent of statutory damages.”

I will shart a little

😳

"accidentally" leaving an anchor dragging across an intercontinental internet cable would do it

Je suis intéressé, je vais essayer d'amener des amis fédiverseux!

EDIT: J'ai pinné ce poteau pour essayer d'avoir le plus de visibilité possible ☺️

Now this is art, thank you!

The chair connects to the bum 😂

Piss.

Can someone remake this without AI?

Based-ass province, I should just go right ahead and move there.

Nothing, nor is there any issue with big / little endian, no relation to "Indian", which is a different word with a different pronunciation.

Some of those things do matter, like "black / white" meaning "bad / good" as it affects the way we think about those colours, and "master / slave" is dependent on context.