immibis

joined 2 years ago
[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 8 points 2 years ago

@saplyng @OsrsNeedsF2P It's just Oracle trying to get more Oracle customers as usual.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

@Doug This concern has no bearing on what happens downstream of you. The question is whether you can lock your product to gather more money to pay your bills with, and whether the person who consumes your product can unlock it meaning you don't get as much money but they get an unlocked product.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

@Doug the right of a provider of a thing to lock it down vs the right of a consumer of a thing to unlock it

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@Doug would you like to play at a handicap against the rich? Or are you willing to copy their tactics and play even?

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 1 points 2 years ago (9 children)

@Doug it's the same legal principle.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 1 points 2 years ago (11 children)

@Doug do you think that Nintendo has a right to lock down its consoles so you can only play licensed Nintendo games? This is basically the same thing.

In the usual situation, Nintendo has a right to try to lock down my console and I also have a right to try to unlock it. This is also the situation we have today with adblockers.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

@Doug another perspective is that there's nothing wrong with wanting everything for free.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@Doug @LinkOpensChest_wav noting that a fair subscription price for MOST websites is on the order of $1-$10 per user per YEAR.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@Doug @LinkOpensChest_wav for sites I very frequently use, I'm also happy to pay a subscription. I have been subscribed to LWN and to YouTube.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 3 points 2 years ago (20 children)

@Doug @LinkOpensChest_wav I used to think this way but so much advertising today is malware. I'm happy for sites to write simple text or image ads that won't even be detected by adblockers, much less actually blocked. It's the pile of JavaScript that's the problem, and it's the pile of JavaScript that adblockers block.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 1 points 2 years ago

@Helldiver_M @Dubious_Fart @leraje actually the port forwarding thing is about accepting inbound connections. Without port forwarding, NAT routers (including VPNs) randomly allocate ports for outbound connections but still won't accept inbound connections on those same ports.

There's a trick where you discover the randomly allocated port numbers and then both connect to each other at the same time so both routers think it's outbound. It works unreliably and BitTorrent doesn't use it.

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@Cyyris @corsicanguppy office bosses universally seem to care a lot more about your physical presence at the office, than about the work you so. Maybe they know the jobs are all bullshit jobs and they just like exercising power

view more: ‹ prev next ›