ilinamorato

parking violations and impound fees that they didn't account for.

Yes, because as everyone knows, you lose all your ability to make good parking decisions when you live in housing without attached parking.

"Ohhh nooo, I was going to park a block away and pay the meter, like I do literally every time I drive anywhere, but now I have to leave my car in the middle of the street! I can't help myself!"

Indiana resident, can confirm

This is human behavior. Being selfish and tearing down everything you don't understand, grabbing power with both hands and using it for your own enrichment, abusing and treating people as disposable, and lying to get more of all of it no matter who it hurts has been human behavior for a very long time. And following it because you think that you can use it, or that you can snap up the scraps that fall from the table, or just because you believe it? That's human, too. It's not good, but it's something that the human race has always been capable of. We see all of both of these things in the oldest documents we have.

If it's possible to ever grow beyond that as a species, we have to recognize it as a part of us so that we can fight it even when it's not imminent; if it's something outside of us, we only have to react to it when it wanders out of the woods. But it's within us; we have to act before it rears its head and devours us.

No. Don't flinch on this. A human is doing this, and a human can do it again. There are no consequences for a beast in the woods. We do not hold a bear accountable for his actions. As soon as we think it's only monsters who are capable of monstrosity, we turn it into a simple matter of defending against a threat from without, but the danger is in our midst. A human is doing this, and we have to hold that human accountable.

Substack is an email newsletter platform that supports paid subscriptions. They were exposed a few years ago as allowing Nazis to host their newsletters and make money on their platform; when this became public, the people in charge at Substack said they would not stop allowing Nazis to use the platform, including to be paid for making Nazi content.

This week, they sent out push notifications that actively recommended Nazi content to users.

Callous or not, it's hard to justify trials ethically for that reason. Yes, it would be better for society as a whole, even if it could potentially be worse for an individual; but is it ethically right to burn up an individual for the sake of society? And now if you'll excuse me, I have to walk away from Omelas.

Edit: Pre-empting a question: Yes, I walk. I recognize that the trolley would be quicker.

Anti-consumer for the sake of the bottom line is to be expected, but they're burning millions of dollars on this.

I suppose it makes some sense. We were making 1970s throwback shows and movies as early as the 1990s.

Sounds awesome. Does anyone know where I could find a decomp?

Cut it while it's at least a little bit frozen. Much easier to cut that way.

Across the board, in product survey after product survey, consumers agree with you every time about thin phones. At best nobody cares beyond being briefly conceptually impressed (in a way that doesn't translate into sales), at worst people actively hate how fragile it looks (or actually is). They always would rather have more battery life than a thinner phone, and actually below a certain weight most consumers prefer a phone to be heavier.

So why do companies keep racing to make the thinnest phones?

I honestly have no idea. This isn't one of those things where I pose a rhetorical question and then answer it. The planned obsolescence of the battery seems plausible, but a thinner battery doesn't really correspond to a shorter lifespan, just a shorter duty cycle. Maybe it's just a vanity thing, like a competition between companies, but the bean-counters don't usually let that sort of thing keep going if it doesn't sell. Maybe it's marketing, but that never really succeeds either. I really don't know.

We're actively considering it.