iii

joined 9 months ago
[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Blows my mind people led around by the nose by the GOP still believe their rhetoric about this

Why so adversarial? I'm not even part of that game, on a totally different continent. Blows my mind that the so many people think politics is binary groupthink - sanctimonious indeed!

The observations I mentioned above are factual. Blows my mind that it's so easy to get angry at measurements.

The government is a funnel, not an endpoint. Keep following the money.

That's endless, wouldn't you agree? Especially considering all money is, is someone else's debt.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

but where's the ad-hominem?

"Gotta love people like you who deliberately etc..."

There wasn't a need to rebut anything. Your comment confirmed what I asked from the start. Just in a very unpleasant, toxic, angry, way. They're the same thing under a different name.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Fucking hell what a toxic, ad-hominem, reply!

(although the tariffs have effectively amounted to that without actually saying it)

Especially considering we're saying the same thing.

Politics really destroys the logical thinking part in many people's brains.

[–] iii@mander.xyz -1 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Let me rephrase: in the system that exists, today, the argument "it's consumers that end up paying" works the same for the tarrifs as for sales tax?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 19 points 6 days ago (5 children)

How does that stinky stupid fucking law work with fediverse? Number of known accounts on the particular instance?

How does that fucking shitty law work with nostr, where there is no concept of accounts nor users?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

EU is key enabler too, by promising material support to Ukraine and not delivering. By purchasing fuels from RU, and thereby financing both parties in a war.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It isn't, the license you publish your code under has no relation to whether or not the regulation applies.

For example I develop a small opensource (GPL) application, for which I do paid support. Because of the paid support, it's interpreted as a commercial activity. Without the paid support, I can't spend time on the project. I used to see it as a way to have the large users subsidise the project for all. Turns out it's a huge liability instead.

So I'll have to abandon the project when the law comes into effect. It'll be easier to rewrite it closed source as an employee for those companies, for they do have a legal department.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

FOSS is fucked either way in EU starting end 2027 because of CRA.

EU, the entity that couldn't make a functioning TODO app given a couple million EUR budget, is regulatory killing computing, software and digital communications.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 16 points 6 days ago

I don't think that's how the legal minded people think.

They'll just go after the developers, force the program abandoned and illegal.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 43 points 6 days ago (6 children)

if it ran all the programs I use

Got ya fam: don't use the programs that don't run on linux. UR WELCOME

view more: ‹ prev next ›