ideonek

Fish at the catch-and-take fishery are woried about their reliance on the pound.

At this point if "login by google" was disabled we would feel like blinded. This is not a problem, it's an emergency. All public services withdrawing from Microsoft must be a bare minimum.

That's one prime example of the "strongly worded email".

That's... I'm speechless. I tought it was idiotic when it "just" suggested that workers beg to work more. It had a brazen "abuse and ridicule working people" spin on it. But it not about economic slavery... It's about the acctuall slavery? That is... we need a word for idiotic and evil and the same time.

Thanks for the context.

What do you mean?

I'm not trying to invalidate your point. I'm adding to it. It's one more reason why this TIL don't tell US anything useful. It nither ralible or unexpected data.

It's not a cry for help. It's esthetics. Man chose more violent methods, and women chose things that seems more gentle. Or medicine is much more sucesful in treating overdose than point-blank headshots.

it's about "success" rate. Man, mostly choose more lethal form like guns, while women often choose pills. Women acctualt make most attempts than man, but are more often rescued.

I suspect in China there are cultural reason that unify the "preferred method off atempt"

"... for task that can be completed sucesfully with copy-pasting output with little to no changes": the same not peer-reviewed MIT study published hasetly "to protect the children".

We are better than this.

Thanks

Thank you.

OK, let's slow down for one secound.

1. if you re-designed it with complex multiplication problem instead od writtng tasks, and calculators instead of chat gpt - and change nothing else - you would get exactly the same result. If you reduce the challange to minimum, how do you expect brain to respond?
2. The "we have this not-reviewed singular study based on 50 people we should raise the alarm NOW" is every sensational.

There are so many problems with AI, and we need so many checks and balances. Sure. But let's not change it into another "our pop-science vs their pop-science" kind of problem.

Can someone pleaese explain why this would be bad? I don't have enougt knowledge to get the meme.