hyperhopper

joined 2 years ago
[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Do you believe it's actually possible to eliminate malware? I don't, and I don't think fear of that is a good reason to let a megacorp censored and suppress people's rights.

Also that quote wasn't actually said by Voltaire, but I have another out of context and disputed quote for you that's very relevant here:

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your printshop isn't a de-facto public town square. Apple, Google, Twitter, and other large companies have inserted themselves into that position.

People like you that just go "government vs private business" miss the entire context, history, and nuance because why that distinction even ever mattered in the past and how it came to be.

In the past, almost every business was closer in practice to being an individual. Your local print shop. Your local hardware store, etc. And for businesses like that, I agree with you 100% , they should get the right to do what they want.

However, private mega-corporations nowadays have more power than most governments at the time the Constitution was signed. When a company has the power to decide what more than half the country can put on their own phone, that's national level power, companies can seriously oppreess people, discriminate, etc, at this scale. Sure, this is a case of stopping a bad person, but there have also been cases of apple censoring apps critical of apple or other awful governmental atrocities in other countries. I'd rather apple not be able to censor anything, than be able to censor things like that.

And your last paragraph is flat out wrong. Freedom of Speech is a concept, that means you are free to say what you want. You might be thinking of the first amendment to the United States Constitution, which is just one thing the US government promises to do.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As for Google, I agree.

As for apple, how is anybody supposed to install the app if apple refuses to publish it? Unlike Google, they made their app store the gatekeeper as the only way to install apps for end users.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You also apparently never read or respond to the actual point other people are making.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I support freedom for people. Apple is not a person.

Also "platforms" like the one apple now operates is akin to a "platform" like mail which has been determined to be a right. The thing is popular opinion and regulations have not yet caught up to this, but we have never had singular corporations that have widespread control the way tech companies do now. I believe we need to rectify this and make sure that companies that act as platforms for the public stop meddling with what the public does on those platforms.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

Terms of service can be incredibly one sided. And you don't have the option to not agree or negotiate, and still use the hardware you paid for in a reasonable way.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I don't support rapists. That dude and people that want his app suck.

But everybody deserves to be able to run whatever software there want on their devices. And no company should be able to tell you what to do with things that you own.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

The minis are bad. They make which tile is the entrance less obvious. They take more space to store. They hide tokens behind them.

I like the look of the tiles but they are nice, not better.

This is like a worse version of the shikoky refresh: they tried to change very little but some things they did change harm readability. I prefer the original.

view more: ‹ prev next ›