Then why did they put the name of the latest tech in the title when it's not even relevant
hyperhopper
joined 2 years ago
Because the article specifically said "AI". It could have just said "edited" and left it at that is the methodology was unknown. But when the methodology is both unknown and doesn't affect the story at all, it's bullshit to put a potential lie in the headline just to act relevant to a different hot topic issue.
This looks like a bad 15 minute Photoshop job. Why does she think it was AI? Where is the proof AI was used?
Or is this just more news cycle bullshit trying to throw in the latest controversial keywords 🤔
For a deeper look into the way modern MMOs are changing with regards to player interaction, this is a must-read paper
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XfTt_Q795XvZa2t2gAahfF5G3zp56n04oTALPvNAsFM/edit?usp=drivesdk
This is nothing like a block chain. Blockchains are distributed and assume 0 trust in any actor. This is just a database that you have to have full trust in. Literally the opposite.
Very untrue. Consumers have the power to buy far cheaper Android phones where they have far more freedoms, but not only do the majority of American consumers refuse to do this, they voluntarily and systematically shame those who do.
Statistically, Most American consumers are pretty dumb and act against their own interests
SEO was a problem before Google search became uniqutous
SEO might be the clearest example of Goodhart's law to ever exist
And the 5 plz and thank you
Agreed about them doing nothing against the law in the past.
But against your last anecdote: 150k now is worth more than having to maybe pay 150k later
But when one businesses whims can harm the right of millions, it's time to regulate them so the CEOs feelings don't fuck users over.
Air brushing, Photoshop, and AI are specific methodologies, you can't just use that as a generic term when that will just create more confusion and hide the meaning, especially when the difference is important due to legislation.
I never put out an article saying it was one of them definitively. I just said the style looked similar to another method.