They have a point though, i hope this gives portland extra reason to make the city more walkable (because there is obviously no space for cars)

And here I thought only ai could come up with this kind of stuff

During rush hour, for a lot of people that means 2 tickets a day, four times a week. Those savings on their own might not convince someone to buy a car but there will be people who have no car now consider that an additional benefit. I was not saying this is the best way to spend your money as a government, i was also not saying that this will mean a lot of cars will be bought because of this.

I disagree on this: "One step forward, one step backwards. Somehow, Denmark manages to make public transportation benefit only the people who need it the least."

I'm not saying it does benefit the people who need it the most, but this artificially boost demand for public transport which makes more funding more responsible. Also because it artificially lowers demand for roads it makes it easier to 'sell' not investing in roads.

What is a bad thing about this though, is that it might make it more appealing for people who use public transport to own cars.

Especially him explaining the rules: During each ceasefire, the other side remains peaceful and respectful. Lol

IMAGINE HE WAS ON LEMMY FUUU

Why would he sign it with his name and function and why would he put it in caps? So many questions.

Thanks, though Mercedes might be less likely to share their tech considering they have their own vans (and trucks too).

Humans are a very prosperous species and it seems likely we'll have descendants on Earth for hundreds of millions of years. Even if we manage to destroy civilisation, any group of survivors could be back up and building cities in a geological instant.

As longs as climate doesn't change faster than we and our food systems can adapt, scorching heat, unbreathable air and raging storms can end our prosperity in a geological instant too.

A very rare prize for sure, but is it very valuable too? Considering the wildlife there I'm not so sure.

Didn't know they got to that point already, but I think VW would want it's own system and not license it from BMW. We'll have to wait and see how fast they can realise their goals.

Indeed nothing new here, just that the website had an interview with him. He's from the same party as Mark Rutte and they have been part of the coalition for 10+ years. There will be elections in a few months, probably was just a good opportunity to get exposure because this has been their stance for a while now.