This needs to have multiple levels of "openness" to distinguish between having access to the code, the dataset, a documented training procedure, and the final weights. I wouldn't consider it fully open unless these are all available, but I still appreciate getting something over nothing, and I think that should be encouraged.
And yet, here we are using this metric to discuss how to use less oil. How is this supposed to benefit them?
Yeah, I understood what you mean. I'm saying that's not better because there's no value being created. At least AI is capable of doing some useful work for us.
You can even argue that it can make you money. Invest in a tech company involved in AI, cash out at the right time, boom, "free" money.
Crypto could generate money for you.
Crypto moves money from one hand to another. It doesn't create value in and of itself.
I feel like this is where the "piracy is [not] theft" message breaks down. The question most people care about isn't whether or not it's definitively theft, but rather whether it's ethical or not.
I guess you know me better than I know myself. Thanks for the info.
As bad as it is, this is still a step up from crypto.
But if you don't write more bullshit sentences, who's going to pay for AI to summarize by getting rid of your bullshit sentences?
They were fun until they decided to get rid of stealth. The player character being someone who stands out so much by merely existing gives the impression that this game will probably end up being more of the same.
But then that wouldn't be for health reasons, right?
Also the businesses paying that card fee
... are you not supposed to look at one eye at a time?