Who said anything about relating to others? You criticized a kid for doing what any reasonable kid would do. That's the part I'm responding to.
You would first have to believe that better tasting vegetables was a possibility before you start looking for it.
From an information theory lens, that makes perfect sense. Proximity to a city is proportional to the incentive and ability to increase information density in a city's name. The closer you are to Toronto, the more often the name comes up, so greater incentive to shorten it. And the closer you are, the more likely people are to know what you're talking about when you say "TRONO" because if there's ambiguities, we usually assume it's the one that's closer.
tldr but I am outraged by the existence of this comment.
Considering how few people block all scripts, this could also make it trivial for them to fingerprint you.
Sometimes I take half a day considering just how to address and sign an email.
I can definitely relate. It also takes a lot longer to craft an email to contain all the relevant information. If you miss something, that's potentially several hours or days of back and forth to get everything sorted out and plus the need to context switch each time. If you do a phone call, the context switching happens once and it gives you the freedom to go "I need help but I don't know exactly how to describe the problem or what information you need" and the other party can help fill in the blanks for you.
Ever meet a kid that wanted to be a cop? Why do you think they had such aspirations? Surely not to uphold the status quo and maintain the power structures in our society. They're idealistic kids who think they'll be helping make the world a better place. That dream doesn't suddenly die for everyone upon reaching adulthood. Would it be effective? Maybe not. But it's not like people don't make poor life decisions all the time.
You told me that you're judging them for their chosen profession. Admittedly, I may be lacking in imagination here, but I don't see what other information you could be basing these judgements on if it's not their public behaviour or knowing literally every single person who's ever wanted to be a cop and their motivation. The filtering process is irrelevant when we're talking about the decision to go through the process at all.
You can't imagine changing the system so that it stops being oppressive?
Selection bias. You're basing this on what you know of active cops. The ones who died were not active cops.
I've just been using a plain old pair of scissors
I don't know why you say "points" plural. I made one point and it's that shortrounddev@lemmy.world came to a very logical conclusion as a kid. No mention of any other kids, let alone all kids. But no matter. If you believe that you know more about shortrounddev's life than shortrounddev, then we're starting from a completely different basis of contradictory facts. You are correct if your bases are correct, and likewise for mine. Maybe you do know more about their life for all I know. I'm just an Internet stranger. I don't know you. I don't know shortrounddev.