hoodatninja

joined 2 years ago
[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But not Mullvad. Bizarre to me lol

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My point is I don't think it's necessarily a bad SOP lol

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again: If instances weren't supposed to be ever defederate, then we wouldn't have the tool. In the absence of real moderation/admin tools it's going to get used more frequently. And that's the admin owner's right!

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I still can't believe IA took this risk, however. I agree it should've been fine, but they and we know it isn't. They basically begged for this to happen and I don't understand why when they clearly don't have their ducks in a row to pick this fight (unlike TPB which plays the game well).

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

sounds like AC3 all over again. Can’t wait to play.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago

I’m all for acting your wage, but I don’t want to make victims of anyone who is interacting with my company simply because I was feeling spiteful. The company will be fine, the tons of people who just had their information leaked are the ones who are truly inconvenienced and may face financial repercussions later on when their information is distributed. Just something to consider

view more: ‹ prev next ›