what about sall

my partner likes it a lot because they play as carby and the game is forced to progress while they progress. As opposed to Mario, where my sheer gamer skill makes it so that they could technically do nothing and the level would complete, they like the game moving forward because of their inputs.

I think it's really good but I wish they worked on the effects and floaty feel of the game to make it CRUNCHIER. It could use tighter controls and better sound design. Compare Planet Robobot, super satisfying and crunchy game to play.

I'll be honest, I watched thunderf00t for like two videos making fun of solar panel roads because they're dumb, then I saw the anti feminist stuff and thought, hey this guy's a tool.

chairdog moment

maybe

I sincerely do hope this changes things in a material way for Palestinian people, even though I'm fully expecting to be disappointed.

i just realized that the latest fad was "squares". I was looking for so long as to what kelly thought was the latest fad.

https://hexbear.net/c/badposting is this way

This song is so great.

"You haven't tried in two years, so why start today?" is honestly so haunting. It's a sort of terrifying sentiment that I can see rip people up slowly and subtly over time. The idea of procrastinating and bad habits being self reinforcing because, to break them, you have to admit that ALL the time before trying to break that habit was wasted, and that every time that decision was made to "not try" was a mistake. It's so insidiously difficult, and outwardly difficult to understand why people fall into that pattern.

That's wild. I typically mod Stardew and stop playing it a bit after I am done hyperfixating on reaching the bottom of the mines as quickly as possible.

I am not a system but one time someone asked if I was a system because I had the addendum "68 Center Host" on my discord user name, because I was hosting the center area of a game with 68 participants.

I am not quite exciting enough to have 67 other people living in my head, but to the comrades who do, and I hope that they can find joy in their very unique experiences.

Yeah it is basically a joker scheme.

Another way to look at it is like a device that you and I sit on opposite sides of.

If I put in a coin, you get three coins. If you put in a coin, I get three coins.

Putting in a coin strictly hurts the actor putting the coin in. Playing it "optimally", there's no reason to ever put in a coin. Even though we could easily both walk away two coins richer, if we are "purely rational, self interested actors", we'll both walk away with nothing.

Technically, this scenario is flawed because "betraying" the other person makes the scenario worse for everyone if the other person also "betrays". A true prisoner's dilemma is supposed to be pretty clear cut "always right to betray", meanwhile in this a selfish actor would have reason not to pull the lever as to avoid losing the people on their trolley.