I think you replied to the wrong post?
hessenjunge
joined 2 years ago
Schwanzkäfer
Please go and ask a plumber this question. Preferably a relative at a family gathering and in front of everyone. This will bring enjoyment for years to come.
And a tube has how many openings?
And a pipe has 2 openings otherwise it would be a cup, wouldn’t it?
One digestive? Are you a jellyfish?
That’s insane, pronunciation and meaning are indeed very similar.
Kacke - which is coincidentally a German word that describes the look and taste of said cake very well.
Ich glaube das ist aus einem Video, in welchem eine Tochter ihrem Vater dauernd DadJokes erzählt und ihn filmt.
Er lacht sich schlapp und die anderen sterben an Cringe.
I agree that videos that take 15 minutes to explain something that could have been explained in 5 suck. A video explaining how to tie a bowline should be longer than a minute. However shorts with useful content are quite rare, maybe not even 1% of shorts content. Still there is useful information, thanks for pointing that out - I even found this useful knot
The biggest problem with shorts IMO is the presentation. You get force fed brain rot junk. Even when you klick on the links to specific videos like you and I provided you are taken to a stream of videos where the next videos are usually of the brain rot type.
Seeing how children are affected by this format/phenomenon and how the extremist right has used it for political gain I think it dangerous to leave it unregulated. I thinks it is possible to prevent the junk watching part without content-based restriction.
Sorry, I’m trying to understand your use case and it is still unclear to me. Did you ever seek out a short video to use as a how to?
That’s just idiotic.
I hope this helps:
ChatGPT prompt: Explain a tube to a 3 year old
A tube is like a long, empty straw. It’s round and has holes at both ends. You can use it to drink or to let things go through it. Think of it this way: if you have a roll of toilet paper, the inside part is a tube. It’s just a round shape that is empty inside!
EDIT: Instead of the term opening the LLM uses the term hole colloquially here - just as a scholar of topology would to explain the concept of e.g. an annulus or torus to a student. This highlights that you shouldn't be anal about a "topological hole" while discussing openings. Actually - let's be real - common language terminology should always be applied first and foremost unless there is specific context.