Game Master?
hddsx
joined 2 years ago
I really hate people like you and most of the community in fuckcars.
Is the best solution to remove cars? Yes, yes it is.
But you are forgetting that bloody everyone has cars in the city that won't magically disappear. You need to transition in a way so that you won't need to suddenly remove millions of vehicles from the city and overwhelm junk yards/recycling.
Removing right turn on red will vastly increase safety RIGHT FUCKING NOW. And because it's easy to implement, we should absolutely fucking do this right now.
I didn’t see why it was a clear violation of rule 5. I was wondering why you thought it was
Sure, let's consult merriam webster again since you are dinging me on dictionary definitions: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudice
1 a : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics b(1) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge (2) : preconceived judgment or opinion c : an instance of such opinion or judgment 2 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
You are firmly under 1b2 and 1c.
OK, I pulled out a computer for you so I could see the rules side by side with my post because my mobile client doesn't allow it.
Rule 1: Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here.
OP came in swinging hot, maybe a little toxic, but there are valid points behind the hot words.
However, OP has shown that they are able to accept other viewpoints from valid arguments (https://lemmy.ca/post/48960508/18080134). So I would argue this is borderline.
I have to say, I have no idea what sealioning is though.
Rule 5: This is not a support community.
It is not a place for ‘how do I?’, type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
This isn't a "How do I". This is an open ended attempt (with some frustration) to try to under why members of the community do certain things.
That's my view anyway. What's yours?
You said in your edit: Men are relevant and important to addressing women’s issues.
That's it.
And per merriam webster:
prejudice or discrimination based on sex Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism
Your statement in and itself, shows prejudice based on sex.
A few points:
-
It could be a mistake, but adding context without labeling it as an addition or an edit changes the view of the discourse that has already been made
-
You once again flipped the discriminatory group and the group discriminatory against which is at best a misunderstanding and at worse malicious
-
You are STILL wrong and are mansplaining. You don’t need to insert yourself into women’s discourse. You are literally the type of person women’s only spaces are built to protect against. While yes, help from those who are not discriminated against definitely help the discriminated, that help comes in listening to what they have to say and support. Your expressed viewpoint is more or less: “I am very important and you should hear what I have to say because it is helpful”. You are, intentionally or not, giving subtle hints that you are better than women and that’s why you should be allowed to force your way into their discourse. In this day and age, we call that sexism.
Maybe that’s not your intention, but boy your writing is full of red flags
Same, and I live in the US
I know you edited your post, which still has things I think are wrong, but OP is absolutely correct based on your initial post… JS
It’s not the “ready to flip the table over” energy that bothers me. It’s the ego, which I don’t generally associate with good end results. I suspect we might see Sinema like results if we put her in power. I hope I’m wrong, but that’s why I avoid people with ego.
105
I really don't like the design of the progress pride flag, and I couldn't really put my finger on it until I saw this: https://nava.org/good-flag-bad-flag
For reference, here is the flag I'm referencing as "bad flag":
And here is the original:
So, the original has too many colors, but it's the colors of the rainbow. In order. It's recognizable from really far away, and it's dead simple to draw.
With the Intersex flag, that's 14 colors. There are three shades of "purple". The circle won't be visible from far away. The chevrons are too thin to be very recognizable from far away.
It's not like there aren't good pride flags. Like there are AMAZING ones:
Edit:
In case you don't know what these are: https://flagsforgood.com/collections/pride-flags
Pinch? You mean semi truck?