Sure *are apps might not have a way of knowing but they are still limited by SMB's limitations. If you're sharing individual folders you simply can't hardlink across them. But my bad for thinking SMB didn't allow hardlink inside the same share mount point.
gvasco
joined 2 years ago
I think more the randomness aspect of it, comments people requesting accesses, accounts being created all around, etc...
Narcissism and confirmation bias runs rampant in our governments and top executives.
CIFS is SMB under a diferent name, and it might be that inside a share you can hardlink, but not across shares in the same filesystem.
Are you sharing the top folder holding both folders where you're creating the hardlinks or are you creating individual shares for each folder?
Have you used it? Depending on the client it's actually quite decent, maybe not for finding businesses (although it might surprise you in that regard as well).
Sure it'll be open, but it'll be another data mining platform.
I guess you're right, it's just frustrating this world.
Current world politicians are so tech illitirare it's bewildering. Supposedly they have experts and think tanks at their disposal to help them in these sorts of endeavours, for what? It's insane how much survailance has been ranked up in the past decade.
OoenStreetMaps has existed for ages, but of course those companies deserve an article for their efforts.
Check you ISP connections limits, remember that uploading from an external device will be downloaded by your home router and vice versa.
Probably the user forgot to check the nsfw flag/checkmark.
It's easy to report posts on Lemmy, at least via liftoff which is mostly what I use.
It's neither, it's a limitation of SMB, if you have multiple shares set-up that mount to the root of the SMB share, you can't hardlink accross them, but inside a single share in the root of the SMB share apparently it's not an issue.