grte

Carney was kind enough to let you squat in Stornoway, Pierre. Pretty ungrateful.

For the record, I'm not trying to make any accusations towards you. When I said 'you' in the previous comment take it to mean the general you. From the comments of yours I've read you seem like a good person to me.

Cutting off your leg is tough but doable.

I doubt many people are claiming that just having investments makes you bad. But depending on the specific nature of the investments, you could be. If someone ran out and invested in GardaWorld (or had them and didn't divest) after finding out they took part in building that concentration camp in Florida, I'd certainly judge them, as an example. But even casting it as a question of morality is beside the point, I think. It's a question of conflicts of interest. The personal wealth of our Prime Minister seems to be significantly tied up in the success of American industry. In the context of our current relations with the USA, that doesn't concern you even a little bit? Particularly considering the honestly pretty soft stance he's taken towards them post election?

Link to the summary. (Towards the bottom is a link to an appendix summary statement pdf, you'll want to click on that.)

Nature

Mounted and framed Washington Capitals jersey, personalized with Carney #24.

Source

The Honourable Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America.

Man...Fuck Trump.

[Edit] Oh, and Carney is invested in Palantir, along with seemingly every other American big tech company he possibly could be including the likes of Alphabet, Meta, AirBNB, DoorDash, Uber, Amazon, etc. No wonder he rolled over on the DST so easily.

[Edit to the edit] Also American weapons manufacturers such as Lockheed-Martin, Northrop Grumman, L3Harris.

It might just. Fox News made a big deal about how the government was oppressing the "trucker" convoy. It may be enough of a show for his base that Trump accepts the asylum claim like he did for those white South Africans.

That life is only going to get a little worse when we cut social programs to buy F35s.

I think that's excessively cynical. If the politicians we put in power tend to look the same, that's a little bit on us for only picking from two different parties for the entire history of the country. There are certainly alternative ideas about economics.

Do you mean specifically Carney flipping pancakes or politicians flipping pancakes in general? I can't speak about elsewhere but in Alberta organizations frequently put on pancake breakfasts often accompanying some other larger event. Politicians local to federal (depending on the size of the event) take it as an opportunity to do some glad-handing. In this particular case I guess Carney isn't a proficient pancake flipper.

We don't live in a two party system. If nothing else, we'd be better off with a much weaker Liberal minority.

The annoying thing is that for a lot of his voters it seems like his decisions have been surprising. I'm seeing a lot of, "trust the plan," sort of comments elsewhere like this is all leading to some bait-and-switch social democratic turn. I think the Liberal campaign didn't focus on his fiscal orthodoxy and a lot of people just projected whatever they wanted him to be onto him.

If this party could implode after only one serious attempt at government, it would make me really happy.