goedel

joined 2 years ago
[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

it was true when I wrote it, and there are literally hundreds of new comments since then. got a link?

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

the vast majority of what is consumed by animals would be waste from oil production. so humans do consume those beans, but give the leftovers to livestock. humans use 93 % of the soy, and any industrial waste is what is given to livestock

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

only 69% of the crop becomes soy cake. an additional 7% is given directly to livestock.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

a soybean is only 20% oil. in order for 69% of the global crop to become suy cake, about 85% of the global crop must be pressed for oil. 20% of 85% is 17%. that's how much of the global soy crop ends up as oil according to that chart (between food oil and industrial applications).

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (10 children)

your own last link has a chart that shows soy use. do you see how (almost) every bit of soy fed to livestock is soycake/soy meal? that is the byproduct of pressing soybeans for oil. if we didn't give it to livestock, it would be industrial waste.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

it seems like you understand exactly what i'm saying, but you need to somehow paint yourself as right and me as wrong. fine.

have a nice day.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (12 children)

I'm not being cynical. what I said is true

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 month ago

have a nice day.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

you didnt specify. you made a very broad claim which is not supported by the narrow study.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i can vote for a candidate without supporting every position they've had. i can buy a product without supporting all the labor practices of the company. to say i can't is myopic.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

they only compared retail costs. they didn't account for people who get food for free or near free through poverty subsistence programs or hunting or fishing or farming their own. it basically didn't cover poor people at all.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's not a Holocaust. we don't want to wipe out livestock.

view more: ‹ prev next ›