gnuhaut

joined 2 years ago
[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

XTerm. I used to use rxvt-unicode, but it only supports 256 colors and gave me grief when I tried to get some emacs color theme working. There's only one thing I miss, which is that rxvt-unicode reflows lines when you resize the terminal, which xterm won't do. Oh and urxvtc starts very slightly faster, but no big deal.

I also looked at kitty, and I like that the author of that one tries to champion new features, like full keyboard support on par with X11 apps. But it takes noticeably longer to start and the latency also feels worse.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Better acceleration, steeper inclines, tighter curves at same speed, better ride quality and less wear. As someone has mentioned below, normal trains could go a lot faster than they do in practice, because the ride quality, wear and wind resistance get atrocious, and the tracks need to be exceptionally straight. Making a maglev go fast is more feasible, though you still have the wind resistance issue obviously.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I've seen videos and articles that suggest that many Ukrainians fight because they are forced to do so by other Ukrainians. And what do you mean eradicated? Do you know of some secret extermination camp nobody else knows about?

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Is the intention of urinals to bully women?

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Ackshually, technically, totally fair." This clearly only affects this one group of people in practice. The law was obviously made to garner the bigot vote and distract from the incredibly unpopular shit this government is pulling. This "technically" shit is only deflection. I mean it works great on people who are Islamophobic but don't actually want to admit that to themselves. Plausible deniability.

impose it onto others

How are these children "imposing" anything onto others? You see one abaya, and now you're forced to accept Mohammed as your prophet? Do you know what "impose" means? You used it correctly just two sentences before that.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Weird how in practice this seems to only affect one group of people. Weird how all the bigots seem love this. But this couldn't be the reason for this, could it? Who would ever try to exploit the widespread Islamophobia in France to gain popularity and distract from real problems?

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

So Christians are just less annoying than Muslims? And they should leave if they don't like it here?

Spoken like a true bigot. And you were trying so hard to convince others it's got nothing to do with Islamophobia. Just can't stop yourself, can you?

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (28 children)

New criminal offense: Learning while Muslim.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Good god, I'm helping the fascists? You're the one who endorses fascist policies and repeats fascist talking points. The rise of fascism, as I said before, is due it being a useful tool for the ruling class in preserving the status quo, hence why these talking points are pushed and why demagogues are trying to make the population afraid of immigrants. It worked on you. The problem of people fleeing poverty and violence will never be solved by closing the borders, that just makes it worse, and many people die because of it.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I use "third world", because it wasn't originally intended as "third class" or whatever, and everybody knows what I'm talking about. "Global south" is not geographically correct, "developing countries" is a liberal euphemism that doesn't capture what's going on ("exploited countries" would be better), and when I say "periphery" nobody knows what I'm talking about.

Libs like the educated immigrants, I'm aware. Just not the unwashed masses, who actually need the most help. But oh god why would I think that's because of racism? Is it because biological racism has been replaced with talking points about culture and education in polite circles? You should rather be afraid of the fascists at home, they actually have momentum and numbers. But then again, the stuff you're saying is basically the same shit you hear from them, so I guess that's not a problem then. They're going after Muslims and not atheists, so I guess that's not your problem.

And I definitely think you are, out of xenophobia, imagining some horror scenario of migrants coming to your country and taking over. This is some grade A paranoia, and with this assumption you can justify all sorts of barbaric policies.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You're afraid the migrants are going to undermine your freedoms. Those people are poor PoCs, that's who I mean.

If the exploitation stops, those third world countries will have growing economies and people will have a path to prosperity. People don't just go to other places because those places are richer, they go because they're desperate. They won't be as desperate, they'll have a future to look forward to.

You would advocate turning back climate refugees because of what, demographics? Like what is this shit, I've heard this stuff before. "Those people are not like us, they're uncivilized! They're going to replace us!" Blablabla, your racism is showing. You're so afraid of migrants and what you imagine they might do, you'd rather they die than come to your country.

view more: ‹ prev next ›